Culture and leisure: every shire district ranked by spend per resident
158 councils · median £20.27/person · mean £22.19/person. From MHCLG Revenue Outturn 2024-25.
| Rank | Council | Control | Seats | Population | Total spend | Per resident | vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exeter | Green | 138,399 | £8.8m | £63.51 | +213% | |
| 2 | Ipswich | Ref | 140,274 | £8.9m | £63.44 | +213% | |
| 3 | Colchester | Ref | 200,222 | £11.8m | £59.04 | +191% | |
| 4 | Burnley | Ref | 99,233 | £5.3m | £53.22 | +163% | |
| 5 | Tamworth | Ref | 81,117 | £4.2m | £51.25 | +153% | |
| 6 | Crawley | Ref | 124,008 | £6.1m | £49.21 | +143% | |
| 7 | Basingstoke and Deane | BAS | 193,110 | £9.4m | £48.50 | +139% | |
| 8 | Epsom and Ewell | RES | 83,288 | £4.0m | £48.30 | +138% | |
| 9 | East Lindsey | Con | 145,183 | £6.7m | £46.49 | +129% | |
| 10 | South Derbyshire | Lab | 117,493 | £5.3m | £45.48 | +124% | |
| 11 | Harlow | Con | 98,235 | £4.4m | £44.80 | +121% | |
| 12 | Hyndburn | Ref | 86,058 | £3.8m | £44.40 | +119% | |
| 13 | Oxford | Green | 166,034 | £7.2m | £43.30 | +114% | |
| 14 | Cannock Chase | Ref | 104,088 | £4.4m | £42.09 | +108% | |
| 15 | Tunbridge Wells | LD | 119,694 | £4.9m | £40.79 | +101% | |
| 16 | Worthing | Green | 113,866 | £4.6m | £40.65 | +101% | |
| 17 | Hastings | Green | 91,219 | £3.7m | £40.34 | +99% | |
| 18 | Basildon | Ref | 193,632 | £7.7m | £39.98 | +97% | |
| 19 | Wyre | Con | 118,743 | £4.7m | £39.56 | +95% | |
| 20 | Chorley | Ref | 120,839 | £4.8m | £39.47 | +95% | |
| 21 | Watford | LD | 107,171 | £4.1m | £38.33 | +89% | |
| 22 | Chelmsford | LD | 188,803 | £7.1m | £37.75 | +86% | |
| 23 | East Devon | Ind | 158,239 | £6.0m | £37.70 | +86% | |
| 24 | South Ribble | Lab | 116,113 | £4.4m | £37.58 | +85% | |
| 25 | Fylde | Con | 85,447 | £3.2m | £36.89 | +82% | |
| 26 | Stevenage | Ref | 91,774 | £3.4m | £36.60 | +81% | |
| 27 | Thanet | Lab | 142,691 | £5.2m | £36.11 | +78% | |
| 28 | Babergh | Green | 97,033 | £3.4m | £35.51 | +75% | |
| 29 | Cheltenham | LD | 121,739 | £4.3m | £35.12 | +73% | |
| 30 | Cambridge | Green | 149,352 | £5.1m | £34.47 | +70% | |
| 31 | Lancaster | Lab | 145,006 | £4.8m | £33.45 | +65% | |
| 32 | Horsham | LD | 151,521 | £5.0m | £32.73 | +61% | |
| 33 | Gosport | Ref | 82,921 | £2.7m | £32.48 | +60% | |
| 34 | Lincoln | Ref | 105,114 | £3.4m | £32.38 | +60% | |
| 35 | Mid Sussex | LD | 161,755 | £5.1m | £31.31 | +54% | |
| 36 | Huntingdonshire | LD | 190,619 | £6.0m | £31.24 | +54% | |
| 37 | Mansfield | Lab | 113,138 | £3.4m | £30.43 | +50% | |
| 38 | Norwich | Green | 147,182 | £4.5m | £30.36 | +50% | |
| 39 | Folkestone and Hythe | Lab | 112,411 | £3.4m | £30.20 | +49% | |
| 40 | Swale | Lab | 158,379 | £4.8m | £29.99 | +48% | |
| 41 | Test Valley | Con | 135,201 | £4.0m | £29.77 | +47% | |
| 42 | Gedling | Lab | 120,179 | £3.5m | £29.51 | +46% | |
| 43 | Rugby | LD | 122,378 | £3.5m | £28.54 | +41% | |
| 44 | Pendle | Ind | 99,777 | £2.8m | £28.38 | +40% | |
| 45 | East Staffordshire | Lab | 129,659 | £3.7m | £28.27 | +39% | |
| 46 | Newark and Sherwood | Con | 127,886 | £3.6m | £28.27 | +39% | |
| 47 | Preston | LD | 162,864 | £4.5m | £27.80 | +37% | |
| 48 | Breckland | Con | 146,620 | £4.0m | £27.46 | +35% | |
| 49 | Bassetlaw | Lab | 124,937 | £3.4m | £27.45 | +35% | |
| 50 | Ribble Valley | Con | 65,794 | £1.8m | £27.44 | +35% | |
| 51 | Tendring | Con | 156,759 | £4.3m | £27.14 | +34% | |
| 52 | Welwyn Hatfield | LD | 122,819 | £3.3m | £26.93 | +33% | |
| 53 | Worcester | Lab | 106,671 | £2.9m | £26.74 | +32% | |
| 54 | North Hertfordshire | Con | 137,201 | £3.6m | £26.34 | +30% | |
| 55 | West Suffolk | Con | 188,485 | £4.8m | £25.69 | +27% | |
| 56 | Mid Suffolk | Green | 110,775 | £2.8m | £25.64 | +26% | |
| 57 | Gloucester | LD | 138,598 | £3.5m | £25.55 | +26% | |
| 58 | Melton | Con | 54,052 | £1.4m | £25.27 | +25% | |
| 59 | Broxbourne | Con | 101,900 | £2.6m | £25.18 | +24% | |
| 60 | Runnymede | Lab | 92,118 | £2.3m | £25.15 | +24% | |
| 61 | King's Lynn and West Norfolk | Con | 156,206 | £3.9m | £25.14 | +24% | |
| 62 | Derbyshire Dales | LD | 71,757 | £1.8m | £24.84 | +23% | |
| 63 | Ashford | Con | 140,936 | £3.5m | £24.60 | +21% | |
| 64 | Surrey Heath | LD | 94,492 | £2.3m | £24.32 | +20% | |
| 65 | Rother | Con | 96,133 | £2.3m | £23.96 | +18% | |
| 66 | Maldon | Con | 69,131 | £1.7m | £23.95 | +18% | |
| 67 | Torridge | Ind | 69,841 | £1.7m | £23.67 | +17% | |
| 68 | Staffordshire Moorlands | Lab | 96,651 | £2.3m | £23.28 | +15% | |
| 69 | Elmbridge | LD | 141,926 | £3.3m | £23.23 | +15% | |
| 70 | Boston | BOS | 71,080 | £1.6m | £22.78 | +12% | |
| 71 | Eastbourne | LD | 104,259 | £2.4m | £22.73 | +12% | |
| 72 | Dacorum | LD | 161,420 | £3.6m | £22.47 | +11% | |
| 73 | Tonbridge and Malling | Con | 136,853 | £3.0m | £21.90 | +8% | |
| 74 | North Norfolk | LD | 103,217 | £2.2m | £21.65 | +7% | |
| 75 | Stroud | Green | 125,680 | £2.7m | £21.32 | +5% | |
| 76 | Bolsover | Lab | 83,773 | £1.7m | £20.77 | +2% | |
| 77 | Mid Devon | LD | 84,993 | £1.8m | £20.66 | +2% | |
| 78 | Rochford | Ref | 89,815 | £1.8m | £20.53 | +1% | |
| 79 | Woking | LD | 105,679 | £2.1m | £20.29 | +0% | |
| 80 | Cherwell | LD | 170,426 | £3.5m | £20.25 | -0% | |
| 81 | Rossendale | Lab | 73,045 | £1.5m | £20.03 | -1% | |
| 82 | South Kesteven | Con | 147,151 | £2.9m | £19.95 | -2% | |
| 83 | Dartford | Con | 125,011 | £2.5m | £19.93 | -2% | |
| 84 | South Holland | Con | 99,298 | £2.0m | £19.78 | -2% | |
| 85 | East Hertfordshire | Green | 156,875 | £3.1m | £19.64 | -3% | |
| 86 | Chesterfield | Lab | 106,045 | £2.1m | £19.62 | -3% | |
| 87 | Lewes | Green | 102,363 | £2.0m | £19.35 | -5% | |
| 88 | Wychavon | Con | 138,017 | £2.7m | £19.22 | -5% | |
| 89 | Canterbury | Lab | 162,100 | £3.1m | £19.14 | -6% | |
| 90 | Teignbridge | LD | 138,548 | £2.6m | £19.09 | -6% | |
| 91 | South Staffordshire | Con | 114,423 | £2.2m | £18.85 | -7% | |
| 92 | Castle Point | THE | 90,581 | £1.7m | £18.76 | -7% | |
| 93 | Newcastle-under-Lyme | Ref | 127,727 | £2.4m | £18.63 | -8% | |
| 94 | High Peak | Lab | 91,959 | £1.7m | £18.61 | -8% | |
| 95 | Maidstone | Con | 187,767 | £3.5m | £18.39 | -9% | |
| 96 | Broxtowe | Lab | 114,565 | £2.1m | £18.37 | -9% | |
| 97 | Mole Valley | LD | 88,709 | £1.6m | £18.24 | -10% | |
| 98 | Charnwood | Con | 188,385 | £3.4m | £17.97 | -11% | |
| 99 | Reigate and Banstead | Green | 159,134 | £2.9m | £17.95 | -11% | |
| 100 | Spelthorne | LD | 107,074 | £1.9m | £17.77 | -12% | |
| 101 | Chichester | LD | 128,934 | £2.3m | £17.77 | -12% | |
| 102 | Waverley | LD | 134,284 | £2.4m | £17.71 | -13% | |
| 103 | Nuneaton and Bedworth | Ref | 141,565 | £2.5m | £17.54 | -13% | |
| 104 | Three Rivers | Con | 95,807 | £1.7m | £17.33 | -15% | |
| 105 | Stafford | Con | 141,556 | £2.4m | £17.24 | -15% | |
| 106 | West Lancashire | Ref | 121,995 | £2.1m | £16.98 | -16% | |
| 107 | Fareham | Con | 115,428 | £1.9m | £16.65 | -18% | |
| 108 | North East Derbyshire | Lab | 106,646 | £1.7m | £16.35 | -19% | |
| 109 | Lichfield | Con | 111,932 | £1.8m | £16.35 | -19% | |
| 110 | Redditch | Ref | 87,847 | £1.4m | £16.18 | -20% | |
| 111 | East Suffolk | Green | 249,664 | £4.0m | £15.86 | -22% | |
| 112 | Erewash | Lab | 114,253 | £1.8m | £15.59 | -23% | |
| 113 | Uttlesford | RES | 95,106 | £1.5m | £15.39 | -24% | |
| 114 | Rushcliffe | Con | 126,736 | £1.9m | £14.77 | -27% | |
| 115 | Winchester | LD | 135,632 | £2.0m | £14.77 | -27% | |
| 116 | Hertsmere | Con | 110,212 | £1.6m | £14.75 | -27% | |
| 117 | Gravesham | Lab | 110,671 | £1.6m | £14.70 | -27% | |
| 118 | Tewkesbury | LD | 101,949 | £1.5m | £14.44 | -29% | |
| 119 | Epping Forest | Ref | 137,451 | £2.0m | £14.21 | -30% | |
| 120 | Fenland | Con | 104,896 | £1.5m | £14.00 | -31% | |
| 121 | Arun | Con | 170,064 | £2.4m | £13.92 | -31% | |
| 122 | Adur | Ref | 64,889 | £0.9m | £13.89 | -31% | |
| 123 | South Oxfordshire | LD | 156,470 | £2.2m | £13.84 | -32% | |
| 124 | Braintree | Con | 164,304 | £2.2m | £13.67 | -33% | |
| 125 | Malvern Hills | Ind | 83,227 | £1.0m | £11.75 | -42% | |
| 126 | North Kesteven | Con | 122,468 | £1.4m | £11.08 | -45% | |
| 127 | Wyre Forest | Con | 103,913 | £1.1m | £10.61 | -48% | |
| 128 | South Hams | LD | 92,148 | £0.9m | £9.95 | -51% | |
| 129 | Tandridge | LD | 90,586 | £0.9m | £9.78 | -52% | |
| 130 | Cotswold | LD | 91,661 | £0.9m | £9.58 | -53% | |
| 131 | St Albans | LD | 151,012 | £1.4m | £9.56 | -53% | |
| 132 | Harborough | Con | 104,713 | £1.0m | £9.25 | -54% | |
| 133 | West Lindsey | LD | 99,208 | £0.9m | £9.24 | -54% | |
| 134 | North Devon | LD | 101,222 | £0.9m | £8.58 | -58% | |
| 135 | Sevenoaks | Con | 122,748 | £1.0m | £8.12 | -60% | |
| 136 | Great Yarmouth | Con | 100,529 | £0.7m | £6.90 | -66% | |
| 137 | South Norfolk | Con | 148,448 | £1.0m | £6.46 | -68% | |
| 138 | Brentwood | Ref | 79,326 | £0.5m | £6.08 | -70% | |
| 139 | Vale of White Horse | LD | 149,347 | £0.9m | £5.94 | -71% | |
| 140 | East Hampshire | Con | 129,975 | £0.7m | £5.51 | -73% | |
| 141 | Stratford-on-Avon | LD | 146,258 | £0.8m | £5.33 | -74% | |
| 142 | West Devon | Con | 58,923 | £0.3m | £5.31 | -74% | |
| 143 | Forest of Dean | Green | 89,753 | £0.5m | £5.28 | -74% | |
| 144 | Hinckley and Bosworth | LD | 116,682 | £0.6m | £4.89 | -76% | |
| 145 | New Forest | Con | 176,116 | £0.8m | £4.66 | -77% | |
| 146 | Bromsgrove | Con | 101,685 | £0.4m | £3.56 | -82% | |
| 147 | Blaby | Con | 108,165 | £0.3m | £2.95 | -85% | |
| 148 | Broadland | Con | 138,157 | £0.3m | £2.45 | -88% | |
| 149 | Wealden | LD | 166,908 | £0.3m | £1.98 | -90% | |
| 150 | South Cambridgeshire | LD | 172,544 | £0.2m | £1.40 | -93% | |
| 151 | East Cambridgeshire | Con | 92,906 | £-0.1m | £-0.97 | -105% | |
| 152 | Eastleigh | LD | 142,933 | £-0.2m | £-1.37 | -107% | |
| 153 | Havant | Ref | 126,985 | £-0.5m | £-4.04 | -120% | |
| 154 | Rushmoor | Ref | 105,751 | £-0.6m | £-5.97 | -129% | |
| 155 | Oadby and Wigston | LD | 61,695 | £-0.4m | £-6.79 | -133% | |
| 156 | Hart | LD | 103,162 | £-0.7m | £-7.15 | -135% | |
| 157 | West Oxfordshire | LD | 120,941 | £-0.9m | £-7.18 | -135% | |
| 158 | Dover | Lab | 119,768 | £-1.1m | £-8.84 | -144% |
What this shows. Net revenue expenditure on the culture and leisure bucket from each council’s 2024-25 Revenue Outturn (RO) submission to MHCLG, divided by ONS mid-year population. Higher per-head doesn’t imply waste — it can reflect demographic need (e.g. more older residents), rurality, or policy choice (e.g. retaining in-house services rather than contracting out). Lower per-head doesn’t imply efficiency — some councils have moved costs to fees, grants, or a ringfenced account.
Caveats. Councils under MHCLG suppression for 2024-25 don’t appear here (Birmingham, Slough, Cumberland and others — see their council card for the reason). Comparisons across the tier line don’t make sense, which is why this table is filtered to one council type at a time. Source: MHCLG Local Authority Revenue Expenditure and Financing.