Public money · peer comparison

Culture and leisure: every shire district ranked by spend per resident

158 councils · median £20.27/person · mean £22.19/person. From MHCLG Revenue Outturn 2024-25.

RankCouncilControlSeatsPopulationTotal spendPer residentvs median
1ExeterGreen
138,399£8.8m£63.51+213%
2IpswichRef
140,274£8.9m£63.44+213%
3ColchesterRef
200,222£11.8m£59.04+191%
4BurnleyRef
99,233£5.3m£53.22+163%
5TamworthRef
81,117£4.2m£51.25+153%
6CrawleyRef
124,008£6.1m£49.21+143%
7Basingstoke and DeaneBAS
193,110£9.4m£48.50+139%
8Epsom and EwellRES
83,288£4.0m£48.30+138%
9East LindseyCon
145,183£6.7m£46.49+129%
10South DerbyshireLab
117,493£5.3m£45.48+124%
11HarlowCon
98,235£4.4m£44.80+121%
12HyndburnRef
86,058£3.8m£44.40+119%
13OxfordGreen
166,034£7.2m£43.30+114%
14Cannock ChaseRef
104,088£4.4m£42.09+108%
15Tunbridge WellsLD
119,694£4.9m£40.79+101%
16WorthingGreen
113,866£4.6m£40.65+101%
17HastingsGreen
91,219£3.7m£40.34+99%
18BasildonRef
193,632£7.7m£39.98+97%
19WyreCon
118,743£4.7m£39.56+95%
20ChorleyRef
120,839£4.8m£39.47+95%
21WatfordLD
107,171£4.1m£38.33+89%
22ChelmsfordLD
188,803£7.1m£37.75+86%
23East DevonInd
158,239£6.0m£37.70+86%
24South RibbleLab
116,113£4.4m£37.58+85%
25FyldeCon
85,447£3.2m£36.89+82%
26StevenageRef
91,774£3.4m£36.60+81%
27ThanetLab
142,691£5.2m£36.11+78%
28BaberghGreen
97,033£3.4m£35.51+75%
29CheltenhamLD
121,739£4.3m£35.12+73%
30CambridgeGreen
149,352£5.1m£34.47+70%
31LancasterLab
145,006£4.8m£33.45+65%
32HorshamLD
151,521£5.0m£32.73+61%
33GosportRef
82,921£2.7m£32.48+60%
34LincolnRef
105,114£3.4m£32.38+60%
35Mid SussexLD
161,755£5.1m£31.31+54%
36HuntingdonshireLD
190,619£6.0m£31.24+54%
37MansfieldLab
113,138£3.4m£30.43+50%
38NorwichGreen
147,182£4.5m£30.36+50%
39Folkestone and HytheLab
112,411£3.4m£30.20+49%
40SwaleLab
158,379£4.8m£29.99+48%
41Test ValleyCon
135,201£4.0m£29.77+47%
42GedlingLab
120,179£3.5m£29.51+46%
43RugbyLD
122,378£3.5m£28.54+41%
44PendleInd
99,777£2.8m£28.38+40%
45East StaffordshireLab
129,659£3.7m£28.27+39%
46Newark and SherwoodCon
127,886£3.6m£28.27+39%
47PrestonLD
162,864£4.5m£27.80+37%
48BrecklandCon
146,620£4.0m£27.46+35%
49BassetlawLab
124,937£3.4m£27.45+35%
50Ribble ValleyCon
65,794£1.8m£27.44+35%
51TendringCon
156,759£4.3m£27.14+34%
52Welwyn HatfieldLD
122,819£3.3m£26.93+33%
53WorcesterLab
106,671£2.9m£26.74+32%
54North HertfordshireCon
137,201£3.6m£26.34+30%
55West SuffolkCon
188,485£4.8m£25.69+27%
56Mid SuffolkGreen
110,775£2.8m£25.64+26%
57GloucesterLD
138,598£3.5m£25.55+26%
58MeltonCon
54,052£1.4m£25.27+25%
59BroxbourneCon
101,900£2.6m£25.18+24%
60RunnymedeLab
92,118£2.3m£25.15+24%
61King's Lynn and West NorfolkCon
156,206£3.9m£25.14+24%
62Derbyshire DalesLD
71,757£1.8m£24.84+23%
63AshfordCon
140,936£3.5m£24.60+21%
64Surrey HeathLD
94,492£2.3m£24.32+20%
65RotherCon
96,133£2.3m£23.96+18%
66MaldonCon
69,131£1.7m£23.95+18%
67TorridgeInd
69,841£1.7m£23.67+17%
68Staffordshire MoorlandsLab
96,651£2.3m£23.28+15%
69ElmbridgeLD
141,926£3.3m£23.23+15%
70BostonBOS
71,080£1.6m£22.78+12%
71EastbourneLD
104,259£2.4m£22.73+12%
72DacorumLD
161,420£3.6m£22.47+11%
73Tonbridge and MallingCon
136,853£3.0m£21.90+8%
74North NorfolkLD
103,217£2.2m£21.65+7%
75StroudGreen
125,680£2.7m£21.32+5%
76BolsoverLab
83,773£1.7m£20.77+2%
77Mid DevonLD
84,993£1.8m£20.66+2%
78RochfordRef
89,815£1.8m£20.53+1%
79WokingLD
105,679£2.1m£20.29+0%
80CherwellLD
170,426£3.5m£20.25-0%
81RossendaleLab
73,045£1.5m£20.03-1%
82South KestevenCon
147,151£2.9m£19.95-2%
83DartfordCon
125,011£2.5m£19.93-2%
84South HollandCon
99,298£2.0m£19.78-2%
85East HertfordshireGreen
156,875£3.1m£19.64-3%
86ChesterfieldLab
106,045£2.1m£19.62-3%
87LewesGreen
102,363£2.0m£19.35-5%
88WychavonCon
138,017£2.7m£19.22-5%
89CanterburyLab
162,100£3.1m£19.14-6%
90TeignbridgeLD
138,548£2.6m£19.09-6%
91South StaffordshireCon
114,423£2.2m£18.85-7%
92Castle PointTHE
90,581£1.7m£18.76-7%
93Newcastle-under-LymeRef
127,727£2.4m£18.63-8%
94High PeakLab
91,959£1.7m£18.61-8%
95MaidstoneCon
187,767£3.5m£18.39-9%
96BroxtoweLab
114,565£2.1m£18.37-9%
97Mole ValleyLD
88,709£1.6m£18.24-10%
98CharnwoodCon
188,385£3.4m£17.97-11%
99Reigate and BansteadGreen
159,134£2.9m£17.95-11%
100SpelthorneLD
107,074£1.9m£17.77-12%
101ChichesterLD
128,934£2.3m£17.77-12%
102WaverleyLD
134,284£2.4m£17.71-13%
103Nuneaton and BedworthRef
141,565£2.5m£17.54-13%
104Three RiversCon
95,807£1.7m£17.33-15%
105StaffordCon
141,556£2.4m£17.24-15%
106West LancashireRef
121,995£2.1m£16.98-16%
107FarehamCon
115,428£1.9m£16.65-18%
108North East DerbyshireLab
106,646£1.7m£16.35-19%
109LichfieldCon
111,932£1.8m£16.35-19%
110RedditchRef
87,847£1.4m£16.18-20%
111East SuffolkGreen
249,664£4.0m£15.86-22%
112ErewashLab
114,253£1.8m£15.59-23%
113UttlesfordRES
95,106£1.5m£15.39-24%
114RushcliffeCon
126,736£1.9m£14.77-27%
115WinchesterLD
135,632£2.0m£14.77-27%
116HertsmereCon
110,212£1.6m£14.75-27%
117GraveshamLab
110,671£1.6m£14.70-27%
118TewkesburyLD
101,949£1.5m£14.44-29%
119Epping ForestRef
137,451£2.0m£14.21-30%
120FenlandCon
104,896£1.5m£14.00-31%
121ArunCon
170,064£2.4m£13.92-31%
122AdurRef
64,889£0.9m£13.89-31%
123South OxfordshireLD
156,470£2.2m£13.84-32%
124BraintreeCon
164,304£2.2m£13.67-33%
125Malvern HillsInd
83,227£1.0m£11.75-42%
126North KestevenCon
122,468£1.4m£11.08-45%
127Wyre ForestCon
103,913£1.1m£10.61-48%
128South HamsLD
92,148£0.9m£9.95-51%
129TandridgeLD
90,586£0.9m£9.78-52%
130CotswoldLD
91,661£0.9m£9.58-53%
131St AlbansLD
151,012£1.4m£9.56-53%
132HarboroughCon
104,713£1.0m£9.25-54%
133West LindseyLD
99,208£0.9m£9.24-54%
134North DevonLD
101,222£0.9m£8.58-58%
135SevenoaksCon
122,748£1.0m£8.12-60%
136Great YarmouthCon
100,529£0.7m£6.90-66%
137South NorfolkCon
148,448£1.0m£6.46-68%
138BrentwoodRef
79,326£0.5m£6.08-70%
139Vale of White HorseLD
149,347£0.9m£5.94-71%
140East HampshireCon
129,975£0.7m£5.51-73%
141Stratford-on-AvonLD
146,258£0.8m£5.33-74%
142West DevonCon
58,923£0.3m£5.31-74%
143Forest of DeanGreen
89,753£0.5m£5.28-74%
144Hinckley and BosworthLD
116,682£0.6m£4.89-76%
145New ForestCon
176,116£0.8m£4.66-77%
146BromsgroveCon
101,685£0.4m£3.56-82%
147BlabyCon
108,165£0.3m£2.95-85%
148BroadlandCon
138,157£0.3m£2.45-88%
149WealdenLD
166,908£0.3m£1.98-90%
150South CambridgeshireLD
172,544£0.2m£1.40-93%
151East CambridgeshireCon
92,906£-0.1m£-0.97-105%
152EastleighLD
142,933£-0.2m£-1.37-107%
153HavantRef
126,985£-0.5m£-4.04-120%
154RushmoorRef
105,751£-0.6m£-5.97-129%
155Oadby and WigstonLD
61,695£-0.4m£-6.79-133%
156HartLD
103,162£-0.7m£-7.15-135%
157West OxfordshireLD
120,941£-0.9m£-7.18-135%
158DoverLab
119,768£-1.1m£-8.84-144%

What this shows. Net revenue expenditure on the culture and leisure bucket from each council’s 2024-25 Revenue Outturn (RO) submission to MHCLG, divided by ONS mid-year population. Higher per-head doesn’t imply waste — it can reflect demographic need (e.g. more older residents), rurality, or policy choice (e.g. retaining in-house services rather than contracting out). Lower per-head doesn’t imply efficiency — some councils have moved costs to fees, grants, or a ringfenced account.

Caveats. Councils under MHCLG suppression for 2024-25 don’t appear here (Birmingham, Slough, Cumberland and others — see their council card for the reason). Comparisons across the tier line don’t make sense, which is why this table is filtered to one council type at a time. Source: MHCLG Local Authority Revenue Expenditure and Financing.