The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Tewkesbury.

Liberal Democrats-controlled district. £11m net revenue. 20 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats38 councillors · 20 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£11m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,227
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
16/38
Liberal Democrats 42%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 3 MP parties
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, 3-party MP geography.

Tewkesbury is a district controlled by Liberal Democrats (16 of 38 seats). Net revenue is £11m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 3 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.38 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 16Con 9Ind 7Green 4Tewkesbury and Twyning Independents 2

Liberal Democrats 42% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Robert John Edward VinesConBadgeworth2023
Charlotte Emily MillsIndBrockworth East2023
Jason Paul MillsIndBrockworth East2023
Craig Lee John CarterIndBrockworth West2023
Debbie HarwoodIndBrockworth West2023
Gilbert Ian YatesLDChurchdown Brookfield with Hucclecote2023
Paul Edward SmithLDChurchdown Brookfield with Hucclecote2023
Richard James Gilbert SmithLDChurchdown Brookfield with Hucclecote2023
Liz SkeltLDChurchdown St John's2023
Mary Louise JordanLDChurchdown St John's2023
Stewart Richard DoveLDChurchdown St John's2023
Thomas Jacob BudgeLDCleeve Grange2023
Showing 12 of 38·All 38 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

50%
Council tax
£5.7m · median 61%
40%
Central grants
£4.6m · median 26%
10%
Business rates
£1.1m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 50% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£149
County / upper-tier£1,680
Police£322
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£75
Total Band-D£2,227

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Tewkesbury split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central37.8% of net spend · cohort median 27%
32 of 158+41% vs median
Waste & Recycling33.6% of net spend · cohort median 32%
63 of 158+5% vs median
Housing & Homelessness14.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
70 of 158+5% vs median
Culture & Leisure8.5% of net spend · cohort median 13%
114 of 158-37% vs median
Planning & Economic Development8.0% of net spend · cohort median 14%
131 of 158-45% vs median
Highways & Transport-2.5% of net spend · cohort median -2%
80 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.565 payments · £6.0m gross · 2 Jan 202627 Feb 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
UBICO LIMITED£1.50m25.1%5
STROUD DISTRICT COUNCIL (BUS RATE POOL)£1.30m21.7%1
HMRC£0.55m9.2%8
MARSH UK LTD£0.29m4.9%12
CASEPAK£0.16m2.6%3
SNAPE CONTRACTING SERVICES LTD£0.12m2.0%2
CITY SCIENCE CORPORATION LTD£0.09m1.6%1
CHOSEN HILL SCHOOL£0.08m1.3%1
REDACTED PERSONAL INFORMATION£0.07m1.2%22
GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL£0.07m1.2%3

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.20 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats

Tewkesbury’s territory crosses 3 Westminster constituencies, with 3 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Tewkesbury1575% Cameron ThomasInd
North Cotswolds420% Geoffrey Clifton-BrownCon
Forest of Dean15% Matt BishopLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind, 1 Con and 1 Lab MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Liberal Democrats-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
565 payments · 2 Jan 202627 Feb 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level