The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Rugby.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £15m net revenue. 16 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats42 councillors · 16 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£15m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,378
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
15/42
Conservative and Unionist Party 36%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
3 Jun 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Rugby is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (15 of 42 seats). Net revenue is £15m for 2025-26. It covers 16 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.42 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 15Lab 12LD 12Ref 3

Conservative and Unionist Party 36% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Andrew GlowackiRefAdmirals and Cawston2026
Amanda HendersonLabAdmirals and Cawston2024
Verity Marie Louise RobinsonLabAdmirals and Cawston2023
Richard HarringtonLabBenn2026
Maggie O'RourkeLabBenn2024
Rob BarnettLabBenn2023
Nicky BainbridgeLDBilton2026
Stephen PimmLDBilton2026
Michael Phillip HowlingConBilton2024
Eve HassellConClifton, Newton and Churchover2024
Jamie PullinRefCoton and Boughton2026
Claire EdwardsLabCoton and Boughton2024
Showing 12 of 42·All 42 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

63%
Council tax
£9.3m · median 61%
27%
Central grants
£4.0m · median 26%
10%
Business rates
£1.4m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 63% council tax, 27% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£224
County / upper-tier£1,823
Police£304
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£28
Total Band-D£2,378

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.7 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Rugby split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling32.3% of net spend · cohort median 32%
77 of 158+1% vs median
Corporate & Central23.2% of net spend · cohort median 27%
101 of 158-13% vs median
Culture & Leisure17.4% of net spend · cohort median 13%
37 of 158+30% vs median
Housing & Homelessness15.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
61 of 158+12% vs median
Planning & Economic Development10.6% of net spend · cohort median 14%
115 of 158-26% vs median
Highways & Transport0.8% of net spend · cohort median -2%
31 of 158
Public Health0.0% of net spend · cohort median 0%
33 of 38-93% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.661 payments · £14.6m gross · 3 Dec 202529 Jan 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
MHCLG£5.45m37.3%2
COV & WARKS POOLING£1.31m9.0%1
COV & WAKS POOLING£1.31m9.0%1
WCC COUNTY FUND£1.11m7.6%2
WILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LTD£0.59m4.0%9
OPUS PEOPLE SOLUTIONS LTD£0.42m2.9%9
GATELEY£0.35m2.4%1
SHERBOURNE RECYCLING LTD£0.32m2.2%2
SSI SCHAEFER PLASTIC UK LTD£0.30m2.1%1
PHOENIX SOFTWARE LTD£0.29m2.0%4

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.16 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Rugby’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Rugby1488% John SlingerLab
Kenilworth and Southam213% Jeremy WrightCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
661 payments · 3 Dec 202529 Jan 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level