Every named vote in the Commons.
Each row is a decision Parliament was asked to take — what it meant, who voted which way, and what it changed. Use this to trace the paper trail behind any bill.
Royal Albert Hall Bill [Lords]: Revival
On 15 June 2026, the House of Commons voted on whether to revive the Royal Albert Hall Bill, a private bill (a bill applying to a specific organisation rather than the general public) that had been introduced in the Lords but had not completed its passage before a parliamentary deadline. The motion to revive the bill was defeated by 37 votes to 24. The Royal Albert Hall Bill had sought to update the governance and constitutional arrangements of the Royal Albert Hall, one of the UK's most prominent cultural venues. Defeating the revival motion means the bill cannot proceed in its current parliamentary session and would need to be reintroduced from scratch if its promoters wish to pursue legislative change. The result blocks any reforms to the Hall's internal structure that the bill had proposed, leaving existing arrangements in place. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines, with 23 of the 24 Aye votes coming from Conservative MPs, who supported reviving the bill. The 37 Noes were drawn chiefly from Labour (22), Liberal Democrats (10), and the Green Party (4), with smaller contributions from independents and the Democratic Unionist Party. There were no notable cross-party rebellions of significance: only one Labour MP and one Liberal Democrat voted with the Conservatives in favour. Turnout was extremely low, with the vast majority of MPs from all parties absent, which is typical for private bill business. The bill's defeat reflects the government's and its supporting parties' unwillingness to allow the legislation to proceed, though the precise reasons given in debate are not available in the material provided.