English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 85, 86, 97 to 116, 120, 121 and 123 etc
271Ayes
171Noes
Carried · majority 100 · Government won206 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 271 · No 171 · DNV 206 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The Commons voted 271 to 171 on 27 April 2026 to back the government's position on a large group of Lords amendments to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. The motion covered amendments 85, 86, 97 to 116, 120, 121 and 123, among others, accepting some Lords changes in modified form, rejecting others outright, and proposing government amendments in lieu. It was one of several votes held the same day as the Bill moved through the final stages of parliamentary ping-pong (the back-and-forth process between the two Houses when they disagree). The vote advanced the government's preferred shape of the Bill, which reorganises local government in England and extends powers to mayoral strategic authorities. Key contested issues included whether brownfield land should be formally prioritised over greenfield development, whether the "agent of change" principle protecting existing music venues from complaints by new neighbouring residents should be placed on a statutory footing, and how much local consent should be required before the Secretary of State can impose structural changes on councils. The government rejected Lords amendments on brownfield prioritisation and the agent of change principle, arguing existing mechanisms are sufficient, while accepting a modified version of Lords amendment 2 to include rural and coastal affairs as explicit strategic competences. Labour and its Co-operative Party partners voted unanimously in favour, providing all 271 ayes. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Greens, the DUP and other smaller parties voted against, with no crossover between the two sides from the named parties. The Conservatives framed the Bill as a centralising measure extending Whitehall control over local government. The Liberal Democrats pressed for stronger brownfield protections and for Cornwall's national minority status to be given legal recognition. The result mirrored the other divisions held the same day, all of which the government won by comparable margins.
Voting Aye meant
Back the government's position on this group of Lords amendments to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, likely rejecting or modifying the Lords' changes to the devolution and local powers framework.
Voting No meant
Oppose the government's handling of these Lords amendments, either preferring to accept the Lords' changes as they stand or taking a different approach to the devolution settlement.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
246
0
115
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
98
18
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
57
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
25
0
17
Independent
—
1
4
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government minister defending concessions on rural/coastal affairs and parish councils while resisting statutory protections for brownfield and music venues, arguing devolution works best through local flexibility not central mandates.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (6,531 words) →
Opposition challenges the Bill as centralizing despite its devolution title; calls for brownfield prioritization, local consent for authority mergers, and stronger parish council protections to genuinely empower communities.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,665 words) →
Welcomes rural and coastal amendments but criticizes forced governance model changes and brownfield rejection as false devolution; demands real local choice and environmental protection.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (901 words) →
Backs agent of change principle for music venues to prevent legal harassment; supports statutory protection to avoid £50k+ defence costs for cultural venues threatened by residential development.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (765 words) →
Argues for local consent on mayoral powers and highlights Cornwall's national minority status under European conventions; calls for consultative, not directive, approach to devolution.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,279 words) →
Criticizes two-year delay on Secretary of State powers over combined authorities; demands permanent protections for Cornwall's national minority status and meaningful devolution.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (905 words) →
Advocates statutory agent of change protection for grassroots music venues; documents 350 closures and argues planning guidance alone is insufficient without enforcement and stronger NPPF language.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,059 words) →
Demands mandatory rather than consultative parish council inclusion in neighbourhood governance; argues 20% of country lacks democratic structures and Government amendment leaves gap unresolved.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,363 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0