Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026
302Ayes
153Noes
Carried · majority 149 · Government won192 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 302 · No 153 · DNV 192 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament approved the Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026 on 3 June 2026, by 302 votes to 153. The regulations set out the schedule of reductions to delinked payments, the successor system to the EU-era Basic Payment Scheme (BPS) that previously provided direct subsidies to farmers based on the amount of land they held. The regulations matter because they determine how much financial support English farmers will lose, and how quickly. Delinked payments were introduced under the Agriculture Act 2020 as a transitional arrangement, deliberately separating subsidy from land ownership so that payments could be wound down without penalising farmers who sold or let land. These regulations accelerate and formalise that wind-down, reducing the payments farmers receive through the transition period. The money saved is intended to be redirected toward the Environmental Land Management (ELM) schemes, which pay farmers for environmental outcomes rather than simply for holding land. Farmers who have not yet enrolled in ELM schemes, or who cannot access them, face a direct reduction in income. Labour and its Co-operative Party allies provided all 294 votes on the winning side, joined by four Green MPs, one SDLP MP, and three independents. Every Conservative and Liberal Democrat MP who voted opposed the regulations, as did all five DUP members, four Reform UK members, and one Ulster Unionist. The Liberal Democrats, though traditionally supportive of subsidy reform in principle, argued the pace of reduction was too fast given the financial pressures facing farming businesses. No Labour or Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the government. The vote sits within a broader and contested transition away from area-based farm payments that began after the UK left the EU's Common Agricultural Policy, and which farming organisations have repeatedly warned is squeezing farm incomes at a time of rising input costs.
Voting Aye meant
Support accelerating the withdrawal of old-style direct farm subsidies to fund environmental land management schemes that reward sustainable food production and nature recovery
Voting No meant
Oppose the pace of subsidy withdrawal, arguing farmers face a funding cliff edge before adequate replacement schemes are available, on top of rising costs and other financial pressures
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
262
0
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
90
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
51
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
—
3
2
8
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
4
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Amendment 9 should require OBR reports on changes to fiscal rules themselves, not just measures below thresholds; accuses Labour of planning to change debt definition to hide borrowing.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,673 words) →
Maiden speech supporting fiscal responsibility and green investment to build prosperity; welcomes Bill as enabling growth rather than constraining it.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,229 words) →
Bill is disreputable political theatre that surrenders Parliament's responsibilities to unelected OBR; definition of 'fiscally significant' is dangerously vague and catches too many legitimate decisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,598 words) →
Supports Bill and amendments 6-7 to capture cumulative fiscal impacts, especially PFI debt which represents catastrophic value-for-money failure requiring independent scrutiny.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,804 words) →
Amendments 1-4 strengthen Bill by broadening 'fiscally significant' to include interest rate/growth impacts and requiring consultation on Charter changes; Bill essential safeguard after mini-Budget.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (654 words) →
Bill is toothless: OBR cannot stop budgets, only comment on them; does nothing to prevent austerity; Labour's £22bn black hole claim is exaggerated to justify attacks on pensioners.SNP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,589 words) →
Maiden speech emphasizing fiscal responsibility as foundation for opportunity; Bill enables real change after Tory chaos that left constituents unable to afford mortgages and rent.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,156 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0