A divisionDivision No. 9 · Tuesday, 2 June 2026· Commons· Armed Forces Support

Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 6

99Ayes
371Noes
Defeated · majority 272 · Government won
176 did not vote
Aye100No371DID NOT VOTE · 176

646 Members · Aye 99 · No 371 · DNV 176 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament defeated New Clause 6 to the Armed Forces Bill on 2 June 2026, by 371 votes to 99. The clause had been proposed during the committee stage of the bill, the parliamentary phase where MPs scrutinise legislation line by line and propose additions or changes. The result means the new clause will not be added to the Armed Forces Bill as it progresses through Parliament. Committee stage votes shape the final content of legislation, so defeating this clause removes whatever provision it contained from the bill. The vote is one of several divisions held on the same day during committee consideration of the Armed Forces Bill, a piece of legislation that governs the legal framework underpinning the armed forces. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 265 Labour MPs who voted, all 57 Liberal Democrats, all 29 Labour and Co-operative members, all five Greens, and all three Plaid Cymru members voted against the clause. Support came almost entirely from the opposition benches: 87 Conservatives voted in favour, joined by all five Democratic Unionist Party members, three Reform UK members, one Traditional Unionist Voice member, and two independents. No Conservative voted against, and no government-party member voted for. The pattern reflects a clean government-versus-opposition split, with the large Labour majority determining the outcome comfortably.

Voting Aye meant
Support a statutory requirement to automatically transfer SEN plans for children of armed forces families when their parent is posted to a new base, removing bureaucratic obstacles that penalise service families.
Voting No meant
Oppose legislating a rigid statutory fix, preferring the government's stated approach of practical cross-departmental improvements to SEN transfers rather than a new legal duty.
§ 01Who voted how.470 voting Members · 176 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
271
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
87
0
29
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
57
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
2
5
6
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0