Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 5
170Ayes
301Noes
Defeated · majority 131 · Government won172 did not vote
643 Members · Aye 170 · No 301 · DNV 172 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 2 June 2026 on New Clause 5 of the Armed Forces Bill, a proposal put forward in committee by opposition parties. The clause was defeated by 301 votes to 170. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted opposed it, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, and several smaller parties and independents all voted in favour. The vote determines whether the substance of New Clause 5 will be incorporated into the Armed Forces Bill as it continues through Parliament. Committee stage is the phase at which MPs examine a bill line by line and can propose additions or changes; a defeat here means the clause does not proceed unless reintroduced at a later stage. The bill, once passed, will govern the legal framework for the armed forces, so the content of any additional clauses directly affects the rights, conditions, and support available to service personnel and veterans. The division produced a clean government-versus-opposition split. All 299 Labour and Labour and Co-operative members who voted did so against the clause, with no rebels recorded. The opposition parties united in support, forming a cross-party bloc that nonetheless fell well short of the government's majority. The vote on New Clause 5 was one of several on the same day: New Clause 2 fell by 302 to 171, New Clause 13 by 298 to 80, and New Clause 6 by 371 to 99, indicating a sustained pattern of government resistance to opposition additions throughout this committee session.
Voting Aye meant
Support inserting a provision into the Armed Forces Bill to address immigration or citizenship issues affecting service personnel and their families, placing an obligation directly in armed forces legislation
Voting No meant
Oppose including immigration or citizenship provisions in this Bill, arguing responsibility lies with the Home Office and should be addressed through separate legislation or the armed forces covenant framework
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
273
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
57
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
4
2
7
Reform UK
—
0
0
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0