A divisionDivision No. 514 · Tuesday, 28 April 2026· Commons· Asylum

Draft Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026

308Ayes
81Noes
Carried · majority 227 · Government won
258 did not vote
Aye308No84DID NOT VOTE · 258

647 Members · Aye 308 · No 81 · DNV 258 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 28 April 2026 to approve the Draft Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, passing by 308 votes to 81. The regulations, considered alongside a companion instrument covering failed asylum seekers, give the Home Secretary power to suspend or withdraw asylum support, including accommodation and financial assistance, from asylum seekers found to be working illegally, and remove the existing automatic duty on the Home Secretary to provide support in every case. The vote affects the roughly 107,000 people currently receiving asylum support in the UK, at a cost the government cited as approximately £4 billion in the financial year 2024-25. Supporters argue the change directs support toward those who are genuinely destitute while giving ministers a tool to act against rule-breaking. Critics argue that without a corresponding right for asylum seekers to work legally, the regulations push already-vulnerable people toward destitution rather than addressing the conditions that drive illegal working in the first place. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted almost unanimously in favour, with 306 combined ayes and a single Labour no vote. Opposition came primarily from the Liberal Democrats (55 no votes), the Scottish National Party (9), the Greens (5), Plaid Cymru (4), and several smaller parties. The Conservative Party had no vote recorded in the data. The vote sits within the government's broader asylum reform programme, which ministers have described as building a "fair but firm" system, and comes as Parliament continues to process legislation under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.

Voting Aye meant
Support tightening asylum support rules by giving ministers new powers to suspend or end financial and accommodation support for asylum seekers who breach conditions, such as working illegally.
Voting No meant
Oppose restricting asylum support on grounds that it risks destitution for vulnerable people and fails to address root causes, such as the ban on asylum seekers working, which forces them into poverty and dependence.
§ 01Who voted how.389 voting Members · 258 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
273
1
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
55
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
2
4
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
9
0
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0