A divisionDivision No. 19 · Wednesday, 10 June 2026· Commons· Rail

Railways Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 1

77Ayes
271Noes
Defeated · majority 194 · Government won
296 did not vote
Aye77No271DID NOT VOTE · 296

644 Members · Aye 77 · No 271 · DNV 296 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 10 June 2026 on New Clause 1 to the Railways Bill, a proposal put forward by the Liberal Democrats that would have required the Secretary of State to lay a Passengers' Charter before Parliament within six months of the Act passing. The clause was defeated by 271 votes to 77. The Passengers' Charter proposed by New Clause 1 would have set legally enforceable standards across a range of on-board conditions. These included value for money guarantees, reliability targets, adequate seating on journeys over thirty minutes, and a timetable for improving facilities such as wi-fi, power outlets, luggage storage, accessible toilets, and catering on journeys of two hours or more. It would also have extended the existing Delay Repay compensation framework to cover failures to meet these on-board standards, and strengthened accessibility requirements for passengers with disabilities. The Liberal Democrats provided all but a handful of the 77 supporting votes, with the Greens, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and a small number of independents also voting in favour. Labour MPs voted unanimously against, providing the bulk of the 271 no votes. The Scottish National Party had no votes recorded in either direction. The Railways Bill, which aims to reorganise the rail industry by bringing together infrastructure and train operation under a new Great British Railways body, passed its Third Reading on the same day by 278 votes to 149, suggesting the government retained a comfortable majority throughout the remaining stages.

Voting Aye meant
Support imposing a legal duty on the Secretary of State to publish a Passengers' Charter with enforceable minimum standards for rail services, including compensation rights for passengers when those standards are not met.
Voting No meant
Oppose writing detailed passenger service standards into primary legislation at this stage, preferring to let Great British Railways set and enforce standards through its own framework rather than through a statutory charter.
§ 01Who voted how.348 voting Members · 296 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
244
116
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
26
16
Independent
3
2
8
Reform UK
Voted Aye
5
0
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Keir MatherSupportiveSelby
Moves New Clause 48 on tax consequences of transfer schemes, establishing Treasury regulatory powers for rail restructuring.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (13,161 words)
Nusrat GhaniNeutralSussex Weald
Presents government new clauses and amendments, including Passengers' Charter, accessibility strategy, and rail devolution provisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (40,683 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0