A divisionDivision No. 3 · Wednesday, 20 May 2026· Commons· Constitution and Democracy

King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (l)

78Ayes
408Noes
Defeated · majority 330 · Government won
161 did not vote
Aye79No407DID NOT VOTE · 161

647 Members · Aye 78 · No 408 · DNV 161 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 20 May 2026 to reject amendment (l) to the King's Speech address, the motion that endorses the government's legislative programme for the parliamentary session. The amendment was tabled by Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, and was defeated heavily by 408 votes to 78. It was one of several opposition amendments considered during the King's Speech debate, alongside a Conservative amendment (o) and a Reform UK amendment (p), both of which were also defeated on the same day. The King's Speech debate is the occasion on which MPs formally respond to the monarch's address setting out the government's planned legislation. An amendment to the address is a standard parliamentary mechanism for expressing dissatisfaction with that programme. Because no verbatim text of amendment (l) is available in the debate record, its precise wording cannot be confirmed, but the vote reflects a Liberal Democrat-led challenge to some aspect of the government's stated agenda. The defeat means the government's programme proceeds without modification, and the particular concerns the Liberal Democrats sought to register carry no formal legislative weight. The debate surrounding this day's votes focused heavily on defence readiness, spending commitments, Northern Ireland legacy legislation, and the absence of a dedicated Defence Readiness Bill from the King's Speech. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 61 Liberal Democrat MPs who voted supported the amendment, as did all 7 Scottish National Party MPs, all 5 Green MPs, all 4 Plaid Cymru MPs, and 2 independents, producing the total of 78 ayes. Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Conservative, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against, combining for the 408 noes. There were no rebels on either side. The Conservatives' decision to vote no alongside the government is notable: it meant the official opposition rejected both its own separate amendment and the Liberal Democrat one, voting to uphold the unamended King's Speech address once its own amendment had been disposed of.

Voting Aye meant
Support amendment (l) to the King's Speech address, signalling dissatisfaction with some aspect of the government's stated legislative agenda
Voting No meant
Reject the amendment, backing the government's King's Speech programme as presented without the proposed change
§ 01Who voted how.486 voting Members · 161 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
270
90
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
34
8
Independent
2
4
7
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
James CartlidgeOpposedSouth Suffolk
The Government must urgently publish the Defence Readiness Bill and Defence Investment Plan, commit to 3% GDP defence spending, and scrap the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill to protect veteran morale and recruitment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,304 words)
Luke PollardSupportivePlymouth Sutton and Devonport
The Government is investing record sums in defence (£270bn this Parliament), has signed over 1,200 defence contracts, and will deliver both the Defence Investment Plan and Defence Readiness Bill later in the Parliament as part of an ambitious reform agenda.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,799 words)
James MacClearyOpposedLewes
The Government is moving too slowly on defence; it must publish the Defence Investment Plan and Bill urgently, commit to 3% GDP spending by 2030, and launch defence bonds to mobilise investment at the scale required.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,900 words)
The Defence Investment Plan delay is damaging domestic industry and UK credibility with NATO allies; the Government must publish it before summer recess and provide a timeline for reaching 3.5% NATO target to allow industry to plan capacity expansion.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,512 words)
Sir Iain Duncan SmithOpposedChingford and Woodford Green
Defence spending has been allowed to fall under successive governments; Britain now faces its greatest threat since the 1930s from totalitarian states (China, Russia, Iran), requiring commitment to 5% GDP spending and urgent publication of the Defence Investment Plan and Defence Readiness Bill.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,009 words)
Wes StreetingSupportiveIlford North
The Government must invest rapidly in defence, but national strength also depends on rebuilding the social contract for young people through jobs, housing, and opportunity; without addressing economic insecurity and inequality, recruitment and patriotism will suffer.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,386 words)
Dr Andrew MurrisonOpposedSouth West Wiltshire
The absence of the Defence Investment Plan and Defence Readiness Bill from the King's Speech represents a concerning vacuum in defence planning and industrial strategy at a time of acute threat.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,112 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0