Division · No. 498Tuesday, 21 April 2026Commons Devolution and Local Powers

English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Government motion to disagree to Lords Amendment 37

291
Ayes
144
Noes
Passed · Government won
213 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 21 April 2026, MPs voted by 291 to 144 to reject Lords Amendment 37 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. This was a government motion to disagree with a change the House of Lords had made to the Bill, and the government also tabled its own Amendment (a) in lieu of the Lords amendment, offering an alternative approach. The motion passed comfortably, meaning the Lords' version of Amendment 37 will not form part of the legislation unless the Lords insist on it in further exchanges between the two chambers. **Why it matters:** The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill is the government's flagship legislation for transferring powers from Whitehall to regional and local authorities across England, described by the minister as "the biggest transfer of power out of Whitehall to our regions and our communities in a generation." Lords Amendment 37 concerned local authority governance, specifically relating to provisions about executives and governance structures in councils. The government opposed it on the grounds that its own provisions already struck the right balance, and instead offered a replacement amendment in lieu. The outcome means the government's preferred approach to local authority governance arrangements, rather than the Lords' version, will shape how councils in England are structured going forward. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 288 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted did so in favour of the government's motion, while all 80 Conservatives and 57 Liberal Democrats who voted opposed it, as did all five Green MPs. The Conservative opposition characterised the Bill throughout the debate as centralising rather than genuinely devolving power, with Sir James Cleverly arguing that it "takes decisions away from local communities and places them into the hands of Ministers, often without consent." This division on Amendment 37 was one of several on the same day, with the government also defeating Lords amendments 2, 4, 13, 26 and 36 by similar margins, indicating a sustained Commons-versus-Lords contest over the shape of the legislation as it enters its final parliamentary stages.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's decision to reject Lords Amendment 37 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Voting No meant
Support retaining Lords Amendment 37, backing the change the House of Lords had made to the Bill
§ 01Who voted how.435 voting members · 213 absent
Aye293No144DID NOT VOTE · 213

435 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 213 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
260
0
102
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
80
36
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
57
15
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
28
0
14
Independent
3
1
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
2
1
2
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
5
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Government Minister defending rejection of most Lords amendments as unnecessary or undermining devolution principles; supporting amendments on culture, scrutiny, licensing, and pavement parking; committing to guidance on agent of change and rural affairs.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (7,424 words)
Sir James CleverlyOpposedBraintree
Shadow Secretary of State arguing the Bill is centralising rather than devolving; supporting select Lords amendments (brownfield-first, mayoral accountability, transparency) while criticising insufficient safeguards on land disposal and governance.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,165 words)
Zöe FranklinOpposedGuildford
Spokesperson arguing the Bill withholds real power from local areas; supporting Lords amendments for rural affairs, merit-based commissioner appointments, simple majority voting in London, brownfield-first, committee system choice, parish councils, and agent of change.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,677 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Backbencher emphasising lack of Government ambition on brownfield regeneration and protecting green belt; arguing housing crisis requires funding and political will, not arbitrary targets.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (510 words)
Jeff SmithQuestioningManchester Withington
Backbencher welcoming the Bill but disappointed at rejection of Lords amendment 41 on agent of change principle; urging statutory protections for music venues and cultural institutions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (171 words)
Mrs Elsie BlundellSupportiveHeywood and Middleton North
Backbencher supporting devolution benefits and amendments on private hire vehicles; pressing for stronger enforcement and local knowledge in licensing to end out-of-area operations.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,083 words)
Mr Paul KohlerOpposedWimbledon
Opposing Lords amendment 42 on land disposal as replacing localism with ministerial discretion; arguing it abandons local authority role and lacks proper safeguards for statutory trusts.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (951 words)
Lewis CockingOpposedBroxbourne
Backbencher supporting brownfield-first amendments and pavement parking powers; opposing local government reorganisation without consent and criticising housing target increases unfairly placed on areas outside London.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,347 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0