A divisionDivision No. 10 · Tuesday, 2 June 2026· Commons· Armed Forces Support

Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 13

80Ayes
298Noes
Defeated · majority 218 · Government won
267 did not vote
Aye81No299DID NOT VOTE · 267

645 Members · Aye 80 · No 298 · DNV 267 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 2 June 2026 on New Clause 13 to the Armed Forces Bill, a proposal brought forward during the committee stage of the bill. The clause was defeated by 298 votes to 80. Almost all of the government's Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against it, while 58 Liberal Democrats, 5 Democratic Unionist Party MPs, 5 Greens, 3 Plaid Cymru, 3 Reform UK members, and a small number of independents and smaller unionist parties backed the proposal. One Labour MP broke with the party to vote in favour. New Clause 13 sought to add a new provision to the Armed Forces Bill. Its defeat means the policy it contained will not be incorporated into the legislation as it proceeds through Parliament. The Armed Forces Bill is the primary vehicle for regulating the terms and conditions of military service, covering matters such as discipline, welfare, and the legal framework governing service personnel. Any clause added to it would carry statutory force, making its rejection a concrete decision about what protections or requirements will not apply to armed forces personnel or the institutions that support them. The vote is one of several the committee held on the same day, with New Clauses 2, 5, and 6 all defeated on comparable margins, suggesting a pattern of the government majority blocking a series of opposition and cross-party amendments. The Liberal Democrats voted consistently in favour of these clauses, and with 58 votes in support of New Clause 13 they formed the largest bloc on the losing side. The government's Labour and Labour and Co-operative combined vote of 293 against was sufficient to defeat all of the proposed additions comfortably. The single Labour rebel in favour of New Clause 13 represents a minor but notable break from party discipline on this legislation.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring an independent review of single living accommodation standards for service personnel, on the grounds that decent housing is essential to military retention and welfare.
Voting No meant
Oppose mandating an independent review, likely preferring existing internal surveys and government-led improvement programmes as sufficient oversight of service accommodation.
§ 01Who voted how.378 voting Members · 267 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
268
92
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
4
2
7
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0