National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
206
Ayes
—
353
Noes
Defeated · Government won
92 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons, sitting in Committee of the whole House, voted on Amendment 13 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill on 17 December 2024. The amendment, tabled by the Conservative opposition, sought to soften the impact of the government's proposed increase to employer National Insurance contributions. It was defeated by 353 votes to 206, with the government's position to reject the amendment prevailing comfortably. **Why it matters:** The Bill increases the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions (paid by employers on their employees' earnings) from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which those contributions become payable. Amendment 13 was one of a series of opposition amendments attempting to carve out or reduce this burden for certain sectors. The debate centred heavily on the impact on organisations that are privately run but closely intertwined with public service delivery, including GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities and nurseries. Opponents of the Bill argued that these organisations, unable to raise prices or absorb costs as commercial businesses might, would be forced to cut staff or services, worsening pressure on the NHS. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government versus opposition lines. All 349 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and most independents voted in favour. There were no Conservative votes against the amendment and no Liberal Democrat votes against it, indicating unified opposition party support. The debate saw Labour backbenchers defend the measure as a necessary response to inherited fiscal pressures, while opposition speakers framed it as a broken election promise and a damaging tax on the very public services the government claims to be protecting.
Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a reduced secondary NI rate for qualifying employment, protecting certain employers from the full impact of the NI rise
Voting No meant
Oppose carving out a reduced NI rate, backing the government's plan to apply the full secondary NI increase across the board
559 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 92 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
312
50
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
102
0
14
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
70
0
2
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
37
5
Independent
8
3
3
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
—
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words) →
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words) →
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words) →
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words) →
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words) →
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0