Division · No. 114Tuesday, 11 March 2025Commons Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 10

95
Ayes
323
Noes
Defeated · Government won
227 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 11 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 10 during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause, tabled by opposition MPs, would have made carer's leave a paid statutory right. The amendment was defeated by 323 votes to 95, meaning it will not be added to the Bill. **Why it matters:** Currently, the Carer's Leave Act 2023 gives eligible employees the right to take up to five days of unpaid leave per year to provide or arrange care for a dependant. New Clause 10 sought to go further by making that leave paid. Proponents argued that paid carer's leave would unlock an estimated £5.3 billion in economic value by enabling working carers to remain in employment, and that major employers such as Centrica and HSBC already offer such arrangements voluntarily. By defeating the clause, the House kept carer's leave unpaid as a statutory floor, leaving any improvement to voluntary employer practice or future legislation. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along party lines. Nearly all Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the clause, keeping to the government's position. The Liberal Democrats supplied the largest bloc of votes in favour, with 65 of their MPs supporting the amendment, joined by the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the DUP, the SDLP, and most independents. Only one Labour MP voted for the clause. The Conservatives, despite their broader opposition to the Bill, did not vote for this particular amendment. The vote sits within a wider and politically charged Report Stage debate over the Employment Rights Bill, which has become a focal point for conflict between the government's pro-worker agenda and opposition concerns about the cost to businesses.

Voting Aye meant
Support making carer's leave a paid right, arguing it helps working carers balance employment and caring responsibilities and benefits the wider economy
Voting No meant
Oppose mandating paid carer's leave at this stage, likely citing cost concerns for employers or preferring to address it separately from the Employment Rights Bill
§ 01Who voted how.418 voting members · 227 absent
Aye97No325DID NOT VOTE · 227

418 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 227 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
1
292
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
6
2
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9
0
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Gregory StaffordOpposedFarnham and Bordon
Opposes the Bill as anti-business, claiming £5 billion costs, threatens zero-hours flexibility, and lacks small business consultation.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,187 words)
Steve WitherdenSupportiveMontgomeryshire and Glyndŵr
Supports the Bill as transformative, welcomes fire-and-rehire restrictions, zero-hours controls, and protections for workers' dignity and security.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (511 words)
Sarah RussellSupportiveCongleton
Backs maternity protections, flexible working rights, and third-party harassment provisions; dismisses Conservative scaremongering about unfair dismissal rights.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,193 words)
Nick TimothyQuestioningWest Suffolk
Supports new clause 105 to regulate gig economy substitution clauses and prevent labour abuse, but does not support the Bill overall.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,325 words)
John McDonnellSupportiveHayes and Harlington
Welcomes seafarers' charter and fire-and-rehire protections but seeks stronger measures including injunctive relief and sectoral collective bargaining.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,224 words)
Andy McDonaldSupportiveMiddlesbrough and Thornaby East
Supports the Bill as historic expansion of rights; advocates for single employment status, injunctive powers for unions, and stronger collective bargaining.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,449 words)
Aphra BrandrethOpposedChester South and Eddisbury
Opposes the Bill; warns of £5 billion costs and damage to growth; seeks exemptions for hospitality sector from third-party harassment liability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (865 words)
Imran HussainSupportiveBradford East
Supports the Bill; proposes amendments to align statutory sick pay with living wage and ensure no workers are worse off under new system.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,378 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0