Division · No. 119Wednesday, 12 March 2025Commons Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 110

168
Ayes
314
Noes
Defeated · Government won
165 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 12 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 110 during the Report Stage of the Employment Rights Bill. The clause, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Daisy Cooper, sought to add additional worker protections beyond those already contained in the government's bill. The motion was defeated by 314 votes to 168. **Why it matters:** The Employment Rights Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation reforming employment law in Great Britain, covering areas including statutory sick pay, zero-hours contracts, parental leave, and trade union rights. New Clause 110 would have extended the bill's protections further, but the government opposed the amendment, meaning the bill proceeds without it. The vote reflects ongoing debate about how far employment legislation should go in protecting workers, and at what cost to employers and economic growth. **The politics:** Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the new clause, in line with the government's position. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour, representing an unusual cross-party alignment. The Greens voted against alongside Labour. The debate was coloured by sharp exchanges over trade union funding, business regulation, and the economic impact of the bill, with Conservatives arguing the legislation stifles growth and Labour MPs defending the reforms as long-overdue protections for working people.

Voting Aye meant
Support strengthening the Employment Rights Bill with additional Liberal Democrat-proposed provisions on employment rights enforcement or worker protections
Voting No meant
Oppose the Liberal Democrat amendment, preferring the government's existing provisions in the Bill without these additions
§ 01Who voted how.482 voting members · 165 absent
Aye170No314DID NOT VOTE · 165

482 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 165 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
279
83
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
4
2
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0