Division · No. 118Wednesday, 12 March 2025Commons Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39

337
Ayes
98
Noes
Passed · Government won
209 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 12 March 2025 to pass New Clause 39 of the Employment Rights Bill at Report Stage, by 337 votes to 98. The clause was part of a package of government amendments covering parts 4 and 5 of the Bill, dealing with trade union law and employment enforcement. The government won decisively, with the result reflecting its substantial Commons majority. New Clause 39 formed part of a broader set of government amendments described by ministers as modernising the industrial relations framework. The wider package included changes to industrial action ballot thresholds, notice requirements for employers ahead of ballots, the period for which a ballot result remains effective, and the enforcement powers of the newly created Fair Work Agency. The amendments also extended the Fair Work Agency's remit to cover statutory sick pay and holiday pay enforcement, and brought Northern Ireland statutory sick pay legislation into scope, subject to consent from the Northern Ireland Executive. Ministers framed these as practical improvements designed to make the Bill work better for workers and businesses. Party divisions were clear and consistent with the bill's broader passage. Labour and Labour and Co-operative members voted unanimously in favour, alongside the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the Social Democratic and Labour Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, and a majority of independents. All 95 Conservative members who voted opposed the clause, joined by all six Reform UK members who voted, and one independent. There were no notable cross-party rebellions in either direction.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's package of amendments to strengthen and clarify workers' rights, including protections for agency workers, improved redundancy consultation rules, and establishing a Social Care Negotiating Body.
Voting No meant
Oppose these government amendments, likely on grounds that they impose excessive burdens on businesses or expand state intervention in employment relations too far.
§ 01Who voted how.435 voting members · 209 absent
Aye338No102DID NOT VOTE · 209

435 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 209 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
280
0
82
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
95
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
7
1
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9
0
Reform UKWhipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted aye · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0