Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 297
167Ayes
328Noes
Defeated · majority 161 · Government won151 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 167 · No 328 · DNV 151 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 12 March 2025 to reject Amendment 297 to the Employment Rights Bill, which would have locked in the existing legal requirement for trade unions to give 14 days' notice before taking strike action. The amendment was defeated by 328 votes to 167. The practical effect of the amendment's defeat is that the government retains the power to set notice periods for industrial action by regulation, rather than having the 14-day minimum fixed in primary legislation. Supporters of the amendment argued that a guaranteed fortnight's notice gives public services such as the NHS, schools, and transport providers time to make contingency plans, reducing disruption to patients, commuters, and children. By voting it down, the Commons left the notice period open to future adjustment without further primary legislation. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 279 Labour MPs and 27 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the amendment, as did the SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens. The Conservatives (94 votes), Liberal Democrats (62 votes), and Reform UK (5 votes) all voted in favour, along with the Democratic Unionist Party (3 votes) and a small number of independents. There were no cross-party rebellions recorded within the governing party. The amendment sits within a broader set of changes to trade union law in the bill, which also repeals the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 and rolls back provisions of the Trade Union Act 2016.
Voting Aye meant
Support retaining the existing 14-day notice requirement before strikes, arguing it helps public services and the public prepare for industrial disruption.
Voting No meant
Oppose locking in the 14-day notice period, backing the government's flexibility to set notice requirements by regulation under the new Employment Rights Act.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.
Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
279
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
61
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
27
15
Independent
—
5
3
6
Scottish National Party
Voted No
0
9
0
Reform UK
Voted Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words) →
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words) →
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words) →
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words) →
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words) →
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words) →
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0