Division · No. 121Wednesday, 12 March 2025Commons Employment

Employment Rights Bill Report Stage: Amendment 297

167
Ayes
328
Noes
Defeated · Government won
151 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 297 to the Employment Rights Bill during its Report Stage on 12 March 2025. The amendment, tabled by the Conservatives, was defeated by 328 votes to 167. The amendment related to trade union industrial action and sought to place additional conditions or restrictions on how trade unions could organise and carry out industrial action. **Why it matters:** The Employment Rights Bill is one of the most significant pieces of employment legislation in a generation, covering areas from zero-hours contracts and statutory sick pay to trade union rights and enforcement powers. Amendment 297 focused specifically on the industrial relations provisions of the Bill, seeking to modify the framework governing trade union activity. Its defeat means the government's original approach to these provisions remains intact, preserving the expanded rights and protections for trade unions that the Bill contains. The vote affects millions of workers who are trade union members, as well as employers across both public and private sectors who will need to operate within the reformed industrial relations framework. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 279 Labour MPs and 27 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 94 voting Conservatives and 62 voting Liberal Democrats supported it. Reform UK's five voting MPs also backed the amendment, as did three Democratic Unionists and four independents. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens all voted against. The debate was marked by sharp exchanges over trade union funding of the Labour Party, with Conservative MPs arguing the Bill represented political payback for union financial support, and Labour MPs defending trade union members as ordinary working people whose rights deserved protection.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring public sector employers to secure productivity commitments from trade unions in return for pay increases, ensuring taxpayers get value from union deals
Voting No meant
Oppose attaching such conditions, backing the Employment Rights Bill as drafted without additional constraints on public sector union negotiations
§ 01Who voted how.495 voting members · 151 absent
Aye169No329DID NOT VOTE · 151

495 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 151 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
279
83
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
27
15
Independent
4
4
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Justin MaddersSupportiveEllesmere Port and Bromborough
Supports Government amendments modernising industrial relations framework, strengthening union access, simplifying strike ballots, and empowering the Fair Work Agency to enforce employment rightsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,766 words)
Greg SmithOpposedMid Buckinghamshire
Opposes the Bill as economically damaging, claims it increases regulatory burden on businesses, contests union political fund opt-out changes, and argues the 14-day strike notice period should be retainedConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,458 words)
Liam ByrneSupportiveBirmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Welcomes enforcement improvements but questions whether Modern Slavery Act reform will be addressed alongside Fair Work Agency measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,548 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Criticises Government's understanding of small business definitions and argues the Bill's balance is fundamentally wrong for SMEsConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (73 words)
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Defends trade union contributions to Labour MPs and challenges Conservatives on undisclosed business interestsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (268 words)
Sir Julian LewisQuestioningNew Forest East
Questions whether Government mechanisms will make opt-out processes for union political funds transparent and easy for membersConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (107 words)
Sarah RussellQuestioningCongleton
Questions Opposition claim about political fund ballots by noting they have historically never resulted in fund closuresIndependent/Liberal · Voted no · Read full speech (766 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0