The topic lensIssue · 8 divisions tagged · 14 parties active

Border Control.

Border security and enforcement

TopicBorder Control
ParentImmigration
RelatedAsylum · Legal Migration
Divisions tagged
8
This parliament
Parties active
14
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Liberal Democrats
99% aligned
Recent activity
8
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on border control.8 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
+1262% on-whip · 355 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-3614% on-whip · 112 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
+4999% on-whip · 63 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyLab
+1363% on-whip · 42 MPs
IndependentInd
+1262% on-whip · 12 MPs
Scottish National PartySNP
+3484% on-whip · 9 MPs
Reform UKRef
-3317% on-whip · 8 MPs
Green Party of England and WalesGrn
+4090% on-whip · 4 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent border control divisions.last 5 · of 8 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
19 Nov 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 37
Aye: Support the government's position that voluntary data publication is sufficient, rejecting a Lords-imposed statutory duty to publish immigration and asylum statistics · No: Back the Lords amendment requiring the government to publish immigration and asylum data by law, arguing statutory transparency obligations are needed to hold the government to account
32795Yes
21 May 2025Opposition Day: Immigration
Aye: Support the Conservative opposition's motion on immigration, likely calling for stricter immigration controls or criticising the government's approach to border management. · No: Reject the Conservative motion on immigration, defending the government's existing approach to immigration and border control policy.
84267No
12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 14
Aye: Support removing Human Rights Act protections from immigration decisions, arguing that ECHR-based rulings by UK judges have frustrated deportations and fuelled illegal channel crossings. · No: Oppose disapplying the Human Rights Act from immigration, arguing that human rights protections are fundamental and that removing them would undermine the rule of law and Britain's standing in Europe.
100402No
12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21
Aye: Support giving asylum seekers the right to work after three months of waiting, arguing it reduces hotel and support costs for taxpayers, restores dignity to claimants, and makes no sense to keep capable adults economically idle · No: Oppose allowing asylum seekers to work during the claims process, in line with the government's position that the existing restrictions should remain
89400No
12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Third Reading
Aye: Support the Labour government's approach to immigration: dismantling the Rwanda policy, strengthening enforcement against criminal gangs, and replacing the previous government's legislation with new border security powers. · No: Oppose the Bill — most likely because it repeals Conservative immigration legislation including the Rwanda scheme and Illegal Migration Act, or because it does not go far enough on asylum reform.
31597Yes

All 8 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on border control is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where border control money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Border Control” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 8 divisions