A divisionDivision No. 195 · Monday, 12 May 2025· Commons· Immigration

Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Third Reading

316Ayes
95Noes
Carried · majority 221 · Government won
237 did not vote
Aye315No97DID NOT VOTE · 237

648 Members · Aye 316 · No 95 · DNV 237 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs passed the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill at Third Reading on 12 May 2025 by 316 votes to 95. Third Reading is the final Commons stage, where the House votes on whether the bill as a whole should pass. The result sends the bill to the House of Lords. The bill repeals the previous Conservative government's Safety of Rwanda Act and most of the Illegal Migration Act 2023, ending the Rwanda deportation scheme. In its place it establishes a statutory Border Security Commander to coordinate enforcement across partner agencies, creates new criminal offences targeting people-smuggling gangs, extends police and immigration officer powers to search and seize electronic devices, and enables new data-sharing arrangements between HMRC, the DVLA and law enforcement. Serious Crime Prevention Orders are also strengthened under the legislation. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so in favour. All 86 Conservatives who voted opposed the bill, as did all eight Reform UK MPs present. Two independents also voted against. Several smaller unionist parties, including the Democratic Unionist Party, Ulster Unionist Party and Traditional Unionist Voice, each recorded at least one aye. Plaid Cymru had no vote recorded. The bill had also passed every significant division on its Report Stage on the same day, with the government defeating proposed new clauses by large margins.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Labour government's approach to immigration: dismantling the Rwanda policy, strengthening enforcement against criminal gangs, and replacing the previous government's legislation with new border security powers.
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill — most likely because it repeals Conservative immigration legislation including the Rwanda scheme and Illegal Migration Act, or because it does not go far enough on asylum reform.
§ 01Who voted how.411 voting Members · 237 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
281
0
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
86
30
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
0
2
11
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Dame Angela EagleSupportiveWallasey
Government must balance security with humanity; repealing failed Conservative legislation while introducing robust immigration controls; strengthening enforcement against people-smuggling gangs; each asylum case must be judged on meritsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,291 words)
Jeremy CorbynOpposedIslington North
Asylum seekers are victims of conflict and human rights abuse; the world must address root causes of displacement rather than treating migrants as threatsIndependent · Voted no · Read full speech (139 words)
Lee AndersonOpposedAshfield
All illegal migrants should be immediately detained and deported; treats asylum seekers as security threatsReform · Voted no · Read full speech (94 words)
Luke TaylorQuestioningSutton and Cheam
Asylum seekers should be allowed to work after 3 months rather than 12 to enable integration and reduce public costsLabour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (205 words)
Jim ShannonQuestioningStrangford
Border security cooperation between UK, Ireland and Northern Ireland authorities must be strengthened to prevent illegal immigration via the Irish borderDUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (263 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Previous Government's delays to asylum processing created huge backlogs; current Government must untangle this inherited chaosLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (98 words)
Sir John HayesOpposedSouth Holland and The Deepings
System is being gamed for economic migration; tough enforcement is necessary to prevent abuse of asylum claimsConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (99 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0