Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 14

**What happened:** On 12 May 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 14, a proposed amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill at Report Stage (the stage where the full House scrutinises and can alter a bill before its final vote). The amendment, which took a pro-asylum-seeker-rights approach, was defeated by 402 votes to 98. The government's position was to oppose the clause, and it prevailed comfortably. **Why it matters:** New Clause 14 sought to shift the government's approach toward a more humanitarian immigration policy framework. Its defeat means the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill continues on its original trajectory, maintaining the government's preferred enforcement-focused provisions without the modifications the amendment would have introduced. The outcome affects people seeking asylum in the UK, shaping the legal framework governing how their claims and presence are handled. **The politics:** The Conservative Party provided the bulk of the Aye votes with 85, joined by 8 Reform UK MPs, 2 Liberal Democrats, 2 Democratic Unionists, and 1 Independent, forming an unusual cross-bench grouping. Labour and the Labour and Co-operative Party voted unanimously against, totalling 320 No votes, with the SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, and most Liberal Democrats also voting No. The result reflects a striking division in which a Conservative-led amendment on asylum seeker rights was defeated by the Labour government with support from smaller progressive parties, illustrating the complex realignment around immigration policy in this Parliament.