Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21
87Ayes
404Noes
Defeated · majority 317 · Government won160 did not vote
651 Members · Aye 87 · No 404 · DNV 160 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 12 May 2025 to reject New Clause 21 to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which would have allowed asylum seekers who had been waiting more than three months for a decision to work legally in the United Kingdom. The clause was defeated by 404 votes to 87, a margin of more than four to one. The practical effect of the defeat is that the existing ban on asylum seekers working while their claims are processed remains in place. Supporters of the clause argued it would have reduced government spending on hotel accommodation and support payments, since asylum seekers could have supported themselves financially. Opponents, in line with the government's position, argued that extending the right to work would undermine immigration controls and the integrity of the claims process. The Liberal Democrats proposed the new clause and voted for it unanimously, joined by the Scottish National Party, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, and most smaller parties and independents. Labour voted against by 280 to 5, with Labour and Co-operative Party MPs voting against unanimously. The Conservatives, Reform UK, and Labour together made up the bulk of the 404 no votes. The division sits within a broader report stage on 12 May 2025 during which several other Liberal Democrat and opposition new clauses were also defeated by similar margins.
Voting Aye meant
Support giving asylum seekers the right to work after three months of waiting, arguing it reduces hotel and support costs for taxpayers, restores dignity to claimants, and makes no sense to keep capable adults economically idle
Voting No meant
Oppose allowing asylum seekers to work during the claims process, in line with the government's position that the existing restrictions should remain
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
5
280
76
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
80
36
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government must balance security with humanity; repealing failed Conservative legislation while introducing robust immigration controls; strengthening enforcement against people-smuggling gangs; each asylum case must be judged on meritsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,291 words) →
Asylum seekers are victims of conflict and human rights abuse; the world must address root causes of displacement rather than treating migrants as threatsIndependent · Voted aye · Read full speech (139 words) →
All illegal migrants should be immediately detained and deported; treats asylum seekers as security threatsReform · Voted no · Read full speech (94 words) →
Asylum seekers should be allowed to work after 3 months rather than 12 to enable integration and reduce public costsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (205 words) →
Border security cooperation between UK, Ireland and Northern Ireland authorities must be strengthened to prevent illegal immigration via the Irish borderDUP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (263 words) →
Previous Government's delays to asylum processing created huge backlogs; current Government must untangle this inherited chaosLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (98 words) →
System is being gamed for economic migration; tough enforcement is necessary to prevent abuse of asylum claimsConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (99 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0