Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 12 May 2025 on New Clause 21, a proposed amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on specific changes to a bill). The amendment was defeated by 404 votes to 87. New Clause 21 sought to soften or modify elements of the government's border security proposals, taking a more rights-oriented approach to asylum and immigration policy. **Why it matters:** The defeat of New Clause 21 means the government's original provisions in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill remain intact at this point, without the modifications that the amendment's supporters argued were necessary to protect the rights of asylum seekers. The bill itself concerns the legal framework governing border security, asylum processing and immigration enforcement, and touches directly on the lives of people arriving in the UK seeking protection. By rejecting this clause, the parliamentary majority confirmed that the bill will proceed in a stricter form on the relevant provisions, affecting how asylum claims are handled and what protections apply to those making them. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along broadly ideological lines. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of Aye votes with 63, joined by the Scottish National Party (7), five Labour MPs voting against their whip, five Independents, four Greens and three Plaid Cymru members. The government's Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted overwhelmingly against the amendment, as did all Conservatives, all eight Reform UK members and the one Traditional Unionist Voice MP. The five Labour rebels represent a notable though small act of defiance on the government benches. The vote sits within a broader pattern on the same day, with several other amendments also defeated by similarly large margins before the bill passed its Third Reading by 316 votes to 95, confirming the government's firm control over the bill's final shape.