A divisionDivision No. 36 · Monday, 22 June 2026· Commons· Armed Forces Support

Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11

171Ayes
322Noes
Defeated · majority 151 · Government won
156 did not vote
Aye171No321DID NOT VOTE · 156

649 Members · Aye 171 · No 322 · DNV 156 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament rejected Amendment 11 to the Armed Forces Bill at Report Stage on 22 June 2026, by 322 votes to 171. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MPs including Mark Francois, concerned the Defence Housing Service's budget and its relationship to the defence investment plan, according to the Minister's response in debate. Report Stage is the point at which the whole House considers proposed changes to a Bill after it has left committee. The Armed Forces Bill is legislation that Parliament must renew roughly every five years to maintain the legal framework governing military service. The amendment sought to address how the Defence Housing Service's budget would be set out and connected to the defence investment plan. In debate, the Minister, Louise Sandher-Jones, confirmed the government's intention to publish the defence investment plan before the Ankara summit in July 2026, and said the Defence Housing Service's budget would be clearly set out and subject to annual reporting to Parliament. She argued there was nothing in the existing process blocking work from proceeding, and that the service would be operational from April 2027. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 283 Labour MPs and 37 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, Green, Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, and Ulster Unionist MP who voted supported it. No Conservative MP voted against, and no Labour MP voted for it. The result reflects a broader pattern visible in related divisions on the same day, in which opposition parties united behind a series of amendments to the Bill while the government's majority held.

Voting Aye meant
Support the proposed amendment to the Armed Forces Bill at Report Stage
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the Bill as it stood without this change
§ 01Who voted how.493 voting Members · 156 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
283
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
56
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
3
1
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Jeremy CorbynSupportiveIslington North
New Clause 1 would prevent visiting forces from ICC-indicted states or suspected war criminals entering the UK; emphasises importance of international law and preventing genocide participants from operating in Britain.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,612 words)
Mark FrancoisOpposedRayleigh and Wickford
Supports New Clause 4 (visa fee waiver for service dependants) and Amendments 3–5 (SEND portability, adoption/fostering continuity, NHS waiting list preservation); opposes New Clause 11 on ECHR derogation; demands clarity on Defence Investment Plan and £9.2bn military housing commitment amid Treasury cuts.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,720 words)
Al CarnsSupportiveBirmingham Selly Oak
Praises Bill's four key themes: Defence Housing Service, service justice reform, reservist renewal; defends extended recall age and mobilisation threshold changes as necessary for strategic reserve capacity.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (357 words)
Alex BakerSupportiveAldershot
Welcomes armed forces covenant extension and accountability mechanisms; does not support New Clause 4 today to allow Government time to deliver manifesto pledges; calls for clearer covenant guidance and record-keeping of military families in public services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,506 words)
Jim ShannonQuestioningStrangford
Raises concerns that NI reservists in SMEs face retention challenges from increased recall and mobilisation requirements; requests covenant amendment to explicitly include NI local councils.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (241 words)
Calum MillerSupportiveBicester and Woodstock
Speaks in support of the Bill during Armed Forces Week; notes Liberal Democrat new clauses and amendments on related issues.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,429 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0