A divisionDivision No. 33 · Monday, 22 June 2026· Commons· Armed Forces Support

Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4

164Ayes
311Noes
Defeated · majority 147 · Government won
176 did not vote
Aye164No309DID NOT VOTE · 176

651 Members · Aye 164 · No 311 · DNV 176 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 22 June 2026 on New Clause 4 to the Armed Forces Bill at Report Stage. The clause, tabled by Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative, Huntingdon) and signed by 64 MPs from across the House, would have removed visa fees for non-UK Commonwealth and Gurkha veterans who have served in the British armed forces for four years or more, and for their dependants. The motion was defeated by 311 votes to 164. The practical effect of the clause would have been to waive immigration visa fees for the immediate family members of Commonwealth and Gurkha personnel who have completed qualifying service. Both the Conservative and Labour parties included a commitment to remove these fees in their 2026 general election manifestos, and organisations including the Royal British Legion and Poppyscotland have long campaigned for the change. The defeat means the existing fee requirement remains in place, at least for now. The vote divided largely along government versus opposition lines. No Labour or Labour and Co-operative MPs voted for the clause; all 308 Labour and Labour and Co-operative members who voted opposed it. Conservatives (88), Liberal Democrats (55), Greens (5), the Democratic Unionist Party (5), Plaid Cymru (4), and several independents all voted in favour. Some Labour backbenchers signalled sympathy with the principle but said they would not vote for the clause, preferring to give the Government time to deliver its existing manifesto commitment through other means.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 4 to the Armed Forces Bill, backing whatever additional provision it proposed for service personnel or veterans
Voting No meant
Oppose adding New Clause 4 to the Armed Forces Bill, either disagreeing with its substance or preferring existing provisions remain unchanged
§ 01Who voted how.475 voting Members · 176 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
273
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
88
0
28
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
4
1
8
Reform UK
0
0
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Jeremy CorbynSupportiveIslington North
New Clause 1 would prevent visiting forces from ICC-indicted states or suspected war criminals entering the UK; emphasises importance of international law and preventing genocide participants from operating in Britain.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,612 words)
Mark FrancoisOpposedRayleigh and Wickford
Supports New Clause 4 (visa fee waiver for service dependants) and Amendments 3–5 (SEND portability, adoption/fostering continuity, NHS waiting list preservation); opposes New Clause 11 on ECHR derogation; demands clarity on Defence Investment Plan and £9.2bn military housing commitment amid Treasury cuts.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,720 words)
Al CarnsSupportiveBirmingham Selly Oak
Praises Bill's four key themes: Defence Housing Service, service justice reform, reservist renewal; defends extended recall age and mobilisation threshold changes as necessary for strategic reserve capacity.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (357 words)
Alex BakerSupportiveAldershot
Welcomes armed forces covenant extension and accountability mechanisms; does not support New Clause 4 today to allow Government time to deliver manifesto pledges; calls for clearer covenant guidance and record-keeping of military families in public services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,506 words)
Jim ShannonQuestioningStrangford
Raises concerns that NI reservists in SMEs face retention challenges from increased recall and mobilisation requirements; requests covenant amendment to explicitly include NI local councils.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (241 words)
Calum MillerSupportiveBicester and Woodstock
Speaks in support of the Bill during Armed Forces Week; notes Liberal Democrat new clauses and amendments on related issues.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,429 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0