Public money · peer comparison

Education: every metropolitan borough ranked by spend per resident

35 councils · median £839.89/person · mean £813.84/person. From MHCLG Revenue Outturn 2024-25.

RankCouncilControlSeatsPopulationTotal spendPer residentvs median
1KnowsleyInd
162,565£183.1m£1126.55+34%
2South TynesideRef151,393£164.2m£1084.52+29%
3North TynesideRef
215,025£230.8m£1073.39+28%
4LiverpoolLab
508,961£544.6m£1070.08+27%
5RochdaleRef
235,561£237.6m£1008.51+20%
6SalfordRef
294,348£288.8m£981.30+17%
7WiganRef
344,922£327.7m£950.01+13%
8StockportLD
303,929£287.0m£944.45+12%
9TraffordLab
241,025£226.9m£941.60+12%
10BoltonRef
310,085£291.4m£939.67+12%
11St. HelensRef
188,861£175.5m£929.14+11%
12OldhamRef
251,560£229.9m£913.95+9%
13WirralLab
328,873£297.8m£905.37+8%
14WalsallRef295,678£267.5m£904.62+8%
15LeedsRef
845,189£738.3m£873.48+4%
16SeftonLab286,281£249.7m£872.07+4%
17TamesideRef
239,643£207.6m£866.45+3%
18ManchesterGreen
589,670£495.3m£839.890%
19KirkleesRef447,847£366.6m£818.50-3%
20GatesheadRef202,760£165.4m£815.56-3%
21SandwellRef353,860£285.3m£806.27-4%
22SolihullCon221,242£167.7m£757.98-10%
23BuryLab
198,921£149.1m£749.36-11%
24CalderdaleRef210,929£156.9m£744.07-11%
25DudleyRef
331,930£237.3m£715.04-15%
26WolverhamptonRef
281,251£201.0m£714.68-15%
27CoventryRef369,026£248.0m£672.01-20%
28BradfordRef563,605£356.4m£632.34-25%
29SheffieldRef
582,493£364.4m£625.65-26%
30Newcastle upon TyneLD320,605£197.4m£615.85-27%
31BarnsleyRef
251,770£144.2m£572.85-32%
32WakefieldRef367,666£206.2m£560.77-33%
33SunderlandRef288,606£144.6m£500.97-40%
34DoncasterRef
319,765£155.9m£487.44-42%
35RotherhamLab
276,595£130.0m£470.06-44%

What this shows. Net revenue expenditure on the education bucket from each council’s 2024-25 Revenue Outturn (RO) submission to MHCLG, divided by ONS mid-year population. Higher per-head doesn’t imply waste — it can reflect demographic need (e.g. more older residents), rurality, or policy choice (e.g. retaining in-house services rather than contracting out). Lower per-head doesn’t imply efficiency — some councils have moved costs to fees, grants, or a ringfenced account.

Caveats. Councils under MHCLG suppression for 2024-25 don’t appear here (Birmingham, Slough, Cumberland and others — see their council card for the reason). Comparisons across the tier line don’t make sense, which is why this table is filtered to one council type at a time. Source: MHCLG Local Authority Revenue Expenditure and Financing.