Public money · peer comparison

Children’s services: every metropolitan borough ranked by spend per resident

35 councils · median £315.05/person · mean £318.49/person. From MHCLG Revenue Outturn 2024-25.

RankCouncilControlSeatsPopulationTotal spendPer residentvs median
1BradfordRef563,605£255.2m£452.81+44%
2TamesideRef
239,643£108.1m£451.24+43%
3St. HelensRef
188,861£73.2m£387.69+23%
4LiverpoolLab
508,961£196.3m£385.74+22%
5SeftonLab286,281£106.8m£373.04+18%
6KnowsleyInd
162,565£60.5m£371.99+18%
7South TynesideRef151,393£56.3m£371.71+18%
8SolihullCon221,242£76.4m£345.19+10%
9OldhamRef
251,560£86.2m£342.51+9%
10ManchesterGreen
589,670£201.1m£340.97+8%
11GatesheadRef202,760£69.1m£340.60+8%
12WalsallRef295,678£100.7m£340.58+8%
13CoventryRef369,026£122.7m£332.59+6%
14RotherhamLab
276,595£90.5m£327.31+4%
15BarnsleyRef
251,770£82.2m£326.38+4%
16WirralLab
328,873£105.9m£321.95+2%
17WolverhamptonRef
281,251£88.7m£315.47+0%
18CalderdaleRef210,929£66.5m£315.050%
19RochdaleRef
235,561£73.1m£310.20-2%
20SunderlandRef288,606£89.3m£309.54-2%
21DoncasterRef
319,765£98.5m£307.90-2%
22LeedsRef
845,189£256.7m£303.67-4%
23SandwellRef353,860£107.3m£303.33-4%
24BoltonRef
310,085£92.5m£298.31-5%
25North TynesideRef
215,025£62.5m£290.43-8%
26BuryLab
198,921£57.2m£287.69-9%
27WiganRef
344,922£97.4m£282.30-10%
28Newcastle upon TyneLD320,605£86.9m£271.07-14%
29SheffieldRef
582,493£156.7m£269.05-15%
30WakefieldRef367,666£97.5m£265.12-16%
31DudleyRef
331,930£85.2m£256.66-19%
32SalfordRef
294,348£74.3m£252.54-20%
33StockportLD
303,929£75.3m£247.86-21%
34TraffordLab
241,025£55.9m£232.00-26%
35KirkleesRef447,847£97.0m£216.61-31%

What this shows. Net revenue expenditure on the children’s services bucket from each council’s 2024-25 Revenue Outturn (RO) submission to MHCLG, divided by ONS mid-year population. Higher per-head doesn’t imply waste — it can reflect demographic need (e.g. more older residents), rurality, or policy choice (e.g. retaining in-house services rather than contracting out). Lower per-head doesn’t imply efficiency — some councils have moved costs to fees, grants, or a ringfenced account.

Caveats. Councils under MHCLG suppression for 2024-25 don’t appear here (Birmingham, Slough, Cumberland and others — see their council card for the reason). Comparisons across the tier line don’t make sense, which is why this table is filtered to one council type at a time. Source: MHCLG Local Authority Revenue Expenditure and Financing.