BeyondtheVote
Sign in
The local authorityCouncil · metropolitan_borough · England · 1 of 36 councils (metropolitan_borough)

Sunderland.

Reform UK-controlled metropolitan_borough. £377m net revenue. 25 wards across 0 parliamentary constituencies.

Typemetropolitan_borough
Seats75 councillors · 25 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Websitesunderland.gov.uk ↗
Net revenue · 2025-26
£377m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,093
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
58/75
Reform UK 77%
Westminster
0
constituencies overlap
Dispatch
3 Jun 2026

Reform UK chamber, opposed area.

Sunderland is a metropolitan_borough controlled by Reform UK (58 of 75 seats). Net revenue is £377m for 2025-26. It covers 25 wards spanning 0 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.75 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Ref 58LD 12Lab 5

Reform UK 77% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Caroline ComerLabBarnes & Thornhill2026
Ehthesham HaqueLabBarnes & Thornhill2026
Fiona Katharine TobinLabBarnes & Thornhill2026
David BarkerRefDeptford & Hendon2026
Lynda Joyce AndrewsRefDeptford & Hendon2026
Marie Isabella McCartyRefDeptford & Hendon2026
Heather FaganLDDoxford Park2026
Michael PeacockLDDoxford Park2026
Paul GibsonLDDoxford Park2026
Helen GreenerRefFarringdon & Silksworth2026
Ian Henri DuryRefFarringdon & Silksworth2026
Robert HutchinsonRefFarringdon & Silksworth2026
Showing 12 of 75·All 75 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

36%
Council tax
£135.9m · median 44%
47%
Central grants
£175.9m · median 41%
17%
Business rates
£64.8m · median 14%

This is a grant-heavy councils (metropolitan_borough): 36% from council tax vs the cohort median of 44%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,796
County / upper-tier£0
Police£196
Fire & rescue£100
GLA precept£0
Parish average£1
Total Band-D£2,093

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)

How does Sunderland split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (metropolitan_borough)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Adult Social Care32.2% of net spend · cohort median 26%
2 of 35+25% vs median
Education27.4% of net spend · cohort median 41%
34 of 35-33% vs median
Children's Services16.9% of net spend · cohort median 15%
10 of 35+12% vs median
Waste & Recycling6.3% of net spend · cohort median 4%
2 of 35+52% vs median
Public Health5.6% of net spend · cohort median 4%
4 of 35+30% vs median
Corporate & Central3.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
12 of 35+27% vs median
Planning & Economic Development2.2% of net spend · cohort median 2%
4 of 35+44% vs median
Highways & Transport2.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
8 of 35+37% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.0% of net spend · cohort median 2%
26 of 35-15% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.4% of net spend · cohort median 2%
22 of 35-16% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Sunderland
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level