Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4
171
Ayes
—
274
Noes
Defeated · Government won
202 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 4 June 2025 on New Clause 4, an opposition amendment to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at Report Stage (the stage where MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill before its final reading). The amendment, which sought to add stronger requirements around product standards and regulatory safeguards to the bill, was defeated by 274 votes to 171. **Why it matters:** The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill sets the framework for how goods sold in the UK are regulated for safety and accuracy following the country's departure from EU product standards regimes. New Clause 4 would have added additional obligations or protections to this framework, shaping requirements that affect manufacturers, retailers, and consumers across the UK market. Its defeat means the government's original approach to product regulation remains intact, without the additional requirements the opposition sought to introduce. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 273 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives (90), Liberal Democrats (60), Reform UK (8), Greens (4), and several smaller parties all voted in favour. Two Independents voted with the government against the amendment. There were no notable cross-party rebellions within the governing Labour bloc. The result reflects the government's comfortable working majority at this stage of the bill's passage through the Commons.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring country-of-manufacture labelling on products sold in the UK, to help consumers choose British-made goods and protect domestic manufacturing industries
Voting No meant
Oppose mandatory country-of-manufacture labelling, likely citing regulatory burden on businesses or preferring a more flexible approach
445 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 202 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
244
118
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
8
0
—
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
Supports New Clause 1 to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics to protect UK manufacturers from counterfeit products and unfair competition, particularly from Chinese copies.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,601 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's core structure; argues clause 2(7) enables unconstitutional dynamic alignment with EU law without parliamentary oversight, effectively sabotaging Brexit and reducing the Commons to a rubber-stamp body.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,283 words) →
Defends the Bill's grant of Henry VIII powers as necessary for the UK to maintain scientific and regulatory leadership; rejects concerns about EU alignment as stemming from misunderstanding metrology and standards frameworks.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,685 words) →
Supports the Bill as salvage operation post-Brexit but backs New Clause 15 to establish a parliamentary committee to scrutinise EU-derived regulations, arguing the volume of technical complexity requires dedicated expert oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,013 words) →
Questions the Bill's concentration of power in the Executive; supports Opposition amendments (including amendment 13) requiring parliamentary statements before alignment with foreign law, to protect SMEs from rapid regulatory change.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (490 words) →
Strongly supports New Clause 1 to protect Staffordshire ceramics industry from cheap imports falsely marketed as British-made, citing the sector's heritage and need for fair competition.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (799 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0