Division · No. 141Tuesday, 25 March 2025Commons Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5B

311
Ayes
192
Noes
Passed · Government won
144 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 25 March 2025 to reject Lords Amendment 5B to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, passing the motion to disagree by 311 votes to 192. The amendment, brought back by the House of Lords after an earlier version had already been rejected by the Commons, sought to exempt certain health and social care providers, including GP practices, NHS-commissioned dentists, NHS-commissioned pharmacists, care providers and charitable providers, from the employer National Insurance contribution increases contained in the Bill. The government's successful vote means those exemptions will not be written into law. The Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions paid by employers from 13.8% to 15%, and simultaneously lowers the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions from £9,100 to £5,000 per year. The government is compensating large public sector employers, including NHS England, central government departments and local authorities, for the increased costs. However, independent contractors who deliver NHS-commissioned services, such as GPs, dentists and pharmacists, as well as hospices and private social care providers, do not receive equivalent compensation. Critics argue this creates a structural disparity in which the services most reliant on low-paid care workers and fixed public funding face the sharpest cost increases with the least capacity to absorb them. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government's position. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and Reform UK member who voted opposed it. There were no notable rebels on either side. The vote was one of several on the same day, including a parallel division on Lords Amendment 1B, which the government also defeated by 312 to 190, and it follows a pattern seen in related legislation, including the Non-Domestic Rating Bill, where the Commons has consistently overridden Lords amendments on tax and fiscal matters in the same parliamentary period.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's position of limiting NI exemptions to direct public employers (NHS England, local government, public corporations), rejecting a broader exemption for GPs, dentists and hospices
Voting No meant
Back the Lords amendment to exempt GPs, dentists, hospices and other independent health and social care providers from the employer NI increase, arguing the government's approach leaves key NHS services worse off
§ 01Who voted how.503 voting members · 144 absent
Aye311No193DID NOT VOTE · 144

503 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 144 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
277
0
85
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
99
17
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
65
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
1
4
8
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
Government must reject amendments 1B, 5B, 8B and 21B as they undermine £24bn funding target; exemptions would require higher borrowing, lower spending or other tax rises; approach mirrors Conservative health and social care levy policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,713 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Amendments essential to protect hospices facing £30m annual cost, children's hospices facing £5m combined cost, and smallest businesses already hit by business rates cuts and Employment Rights Bill red tape.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,943 words)
Daisy CooperOpposedSt Albans
Henry VIII powers in amendments would allow government to exempt health and care providers when growth materializes; capital funding for hospices is insufficient; amendment 8B should empower exemption of small businesses.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,137 words)
Sir Roger GaleOpposedHerne Bay and Sandwich
Bill directly taxes jobs in hospices and care sector; government claim of compensation is illusory; hospice care is integral to NHS and should be treated as such; staff reduction is inevitable.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (587 words)
Dave DooganOpposedAngus and Perthshire Glens
Social care, GP, pharmacy and hospice sectors cannot diversify or raise prices; government's £24bn fiscal drag produces only £10bn net benefit and would fall to £8bn if proper exemptions granted; this represents catastrophic policy misadventure.Scottish National Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,046 words)
Gregory StaffordQuestioningFarnham and Bordon
Inconsistency: NHS England exempted but NHS GPs, dentists not; unclear why public body gets exemption while contractors delivering same services do not.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,136 words)
Jerome MayhewOpposedBroadland and Fakenham
Government's exemption of NHS proves it understands the damage to healthcare; deliberate decision to penalize hospices; perverse that assisted dying funding may come from taxation of palliative care.Conservative · Voted teller_no · Read full speech (469 words)
Sir Edward LeighOpposedGainsborough
St Barnabas hospice in Lincoln losing £300,000 annually; government health settlement does not compensate; contradicts commitment to palliative care expressed in assisted dying debates.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (86 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0