Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 16
100
Ayes
—
339
Noes
Defeated · Government won
204 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 16 to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at Report Stage on 4 June 2025. The amendment was defeated by 339 votes to 100. Report Stage is the point at which MPs examine a bill in detail on the floor of the whole House and can propose changes to the text that emerged from committee scrutiny. **Why it matters:** The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill sets out the legal framework governing how products are regulated and measured for sale in the UK market, including questions of technical standards, conformity assessments, and enforcement. Amendment 16 sought to modify the government's proposed framework, pushing for what the Aye side characterised as stronger consumer protection or stricter enforcement provisions. Its defeat means the government's version of these regulatory arrangements remains intact, affecting businesses that manufacture or sell goods in the UK and consumers who rely on product safety standards. **The politics:** The division fell largely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, as did the Liberal Democrats and the Greens, all backing the government's position. The Conservatives provided the bulk of the Aye votes with 89 MPs supporting the amendment, joined by 7 Reform UK MPs, 2 Democratic Unionist Party members, and 1 Traditional Unionist Voice MP. One Liberal Democrat MP voted with the Ayes, representing a minor cross-party dissent from that party's otherwise unified opposition to the amendment. With a majority of 239 votes, the government comfortably defeated the challenge, underlining its strong working majority on this legislation.
Voting Aye meant
Support removing automatic EU regulatory alignment from UK product law, asserting UK sovereignty over its own product standards
Voting No meant
Oppose removing EU alignment provisions, preferring to retain flexibility to recognise EU standards as a route to compliance in UK law
439 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 204 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
243
119
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
89
0
27
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
1
60
11
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
2
3
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
—
Plaid Cymru
0
2
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
Supports New Clause 1 to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics to protect UK manufacturers from counterfeit products and unfair competition, particularly from Chinese copies.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,601 words) →
Opposed to the Bill's core structure; argues clause 2(7) enables unconstitutional dynamic alignment with EU law without parliamentary oversight, effectively sabotaging Brexit and reducing the Commons to a rubber-stamp body.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,283 words) →
Defends the Bill's grant of Henry VIII powers as necessary for the UK to maintain scientific and regulatory leadership; rejects concerns about EU alignment as stemming from misunderstanding metrology and standards frameworks.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,685 words) →
Supports the Bill as salvage operation post-Brexit but backs New Clause 15 to establish a parliamentary committee to scrutinise EU-derived regulations, arguing the volume of technical complexity requires dedicated expert oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,013 words) →
Questions the Bill's concentration of power in the Executive; supports Opposition amendments (including amendment 13) requiring parliamentary statements before alignment with foreign law, to protect SMEs from rapid regulatory change.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (490 words) →
Strongly supports New Clause 1 to protect Staffordshire ceramics industry from cheap imports falsely marketed as British-made, citing the sector's heritage and need for fair competition.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (799 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0