Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords]: Amendment 2
89
Ayes
—
230
Noes
Defeated · Government won
345 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 2 to the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill, a piece of legislation that originated in the House of Lords and sets out how failing banks can be rescued and refinanced. The amendment was defeated by 230 votes to 89, meaning the bill proceeds without the changes the opposition sought to introduce. **Why it matters:** The Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill establishes a framework under which the Bank of England can recapitalise (restore the financial health of) a failing bank using funds drawn from the banking sector itself, rather than from the public purse. Amendment 2 sought to alter the conditions or oversight mechanisms attached to that process, pushing for stronger safeguards around how and when public or industry funds can be deployed in a bank rescue. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to bank resolution remains intact, preserving the regulatory flexibility ministers argued was necessary for the framework to function effectively in a crisis. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 198 Labour MPs and 17 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while all 60 voting Conservatives, all 19 voting Liberal Democrats, and smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the Ulster Unionist Party, and the Democratic Unionist Party voted in favour. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The lopsided result, with the government commanding more than twice the votes of those supporting the amendment, reflects the government's working majority, and the bill now continues its passage through the Commons without this modification.
Voting Aye meant
Support adding explicit protections and guidance for building societies facing potential demutualisation when the Bank of England uses its new resolution powers, ensuring transparency and safeguards for mutual ownership structures.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, either as unnecessary given existing provisions or preferring the code of practice to remain flexible without prescriptive requirements around demutualisation scenarios.
319 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 345 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
198
164
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
60
0
56
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
19
0
53
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
17
25
Independent
3
0
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
Supports the Bill's overall aims but proposes amendments to limit the recapitalisation mechanism to small banks outside MREL, protect mutuals from demutualisation, and require a report on credit union resolution frameworks.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,226 words) →
Defends the Bill's flexibility and scope, arguing that statutory restrictions on the Bank of England's powers would hamper crisis response and that existing safeguards are sufficient; opposes all three main amendments.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,580 words) →
Emphasises the 2008 financial crisis lessons requiring speed and flexibility; strongly opposes amendments 1, 3, and 4 as impractical restrictions that would slow crisis resolution and increase costs.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,800 words) →
Supports amendments 3 and 4 to restrict the mechanism to small/medium banks and require consideration of competitiveness and growth impacts before using the levy.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (366 words) →
Chairs the debate and manages scope; reminds speakers to focus on amendments under discussion rather than broader related issues.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (647 words) →
Supports credit unions; raises concern that bank executives retain bonuses during crises while pensioners suffer, questioning whether legislation protects against executive compensation.Democratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (201 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0