Division · No. 214Wednesday, 4 June 2025Commons Business

Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords]: Third Reading

264
Ayes
99
Noes
Passed · Government won
275 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 4 June 2025 to pass the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at its Third Reading, the final stage before a bill receives Royal Assent and becomes law. The result was 264 votes in favour and 99 against, a majority of 165. Third Reading is the last opportunity for the House of Commons to approve or reject a bill in its final form, after all amendments have been considered. The bill had previously passed through the House of Lords, and this vote confirmed the Commons' agreement to the legislation. The bill updates the legal framework governing product standards and measurement systems in the United Kingdom following Brexit. Previously, the UK operated under European Union regulations for product safety and metrology (the science and law of weights and measures). The legislation gives ministers powers to set and update product regulations, and to align or diverge from international or EU standards depending on trade and policy needs. It affects manufacturers, importers, retailers, and consumers across a wide range of goods, from electrical appliances to consumer products requiring accurate measurement in their sale or production. The vote divided largely along party lines. All 263 Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party members who voted backed the bill, as did the four Green MPs, the two Plaid Cymru members who voted, and four independents. All 89 Conservatives who voted opposed it, joined by six Reform UK members, the one Democratic Unionist Party member who voted, one Traditional Unionist Voice member, and one Ulster Unionist member. There were no Conservative votes in favour and no Labour votes against. The bill sits within the government's broader post-Brexit regulatory agenda, and a related vote on the Draft Marking of Retail Goods Regulations 2025 on 30 June 2025 passed by 315 votes to 4, suggesting continued parliamentary support for this area of policy.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill, including consumer protection measures on product labelling and transparency around shrinkflation
Voting No meant
Oppose passing the bill in its current form, likely citing concerns about regulatory burdens on business or insufficient provisions
§ 01Who voted how.363 voting members · 275 absent
Aye274No100DID NOT VOTE · 275

363 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 275 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
238
0
124
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
25
0
17
Independent
4
2
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Gareth SnellSupportiveStoke-on-Trent Central
Supports New Clause 1 to assess country-of-origin marking for ceramics to protect UK manufacturers from counterfeit products and unfair competition, particularly from Chinese copies.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,601 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Opposed to the Bill's core structure; argues clause 2(7) enables unconstitutional dynamic alignment with EU law without parliamentary oversight, effectively sabotaging Brexit and reducing the Commons to a rubber-stamp body.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,283 words)
Adam ThompsonSupportiveErewash
Defends the Bill's grant of Henry VIII powers as necessary for the UK to maintain scientific and regulatory leadership; rejects concerns about EU alignment as stemming from misunderstanding metrology and standards frameworks.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,685 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Supports the Bill as salvage operation post-Brexit but backs New Clause 15 to establish a parliamentary committee to scrutinise EU-derived regulations, arguing the volume of technical complexity requires dedicated expert oversight.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,013 words)
Richard HoldenQuestioningBasildon and Billericay
Questions the Bill's concentration of power in the Executive; supports Opposition amendments (including amendment 13) requiring parliamentary statements before alignment with foreign law, to protect SMEs from rapid regulatory change.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (490 words)
Dr Allison GardnerSupportiveStoke-on-Trent South
Strongly supports New Clause 1 to protect Staffordshire ceramics industry from cheap imports falsely marketed as British-made, citing the sector's heritage and need for fair competition.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (799 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0