National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Third Reading
354
Ayes
—
202
Noes
Passed · Government won
94 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons passed the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill at its Third Reading on 17 December 2024, by 354 votes to 202. The Bill raises the rate of employer secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions. This was the final Commons vote before the Bill moved to the House of Lords, and it enacted one of the central revenue-raising measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. **Why it matters:** The Bill increases the cost of employing staff for every business, charity, and independent public service provider in the UK. The Government argues this is necessary to raise additional revenue, estimated at around £25 billion, to fund investment in public services including the NHS. Critics in the debate focused heavily on the impact on organisations that sit outside direct public sector employment but deliver publicly commissioned services, including GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities, and childcare providers. These organisations cannot recoup higher wage costs in the way commercial businesses might, and the debate heard estimates including a £940 million additional burden on adult social care providers, roughly £20,000 extra per GP surgery annually, and around £47,000 in additional costs per nursery. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour MPs and 37 Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted in favour. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Green, Plaid Cymru, and Reform UK MP who voted did so against, producing a combined opposition of 202 noes. Three Independents voted with the Government and seven against. The Liberal Democrats tabled amendments seeking to exempt care home operators, domiciliary care providers, and GP practices from the higher rate, and separately to create a reduced rate for registered charities, but these were rejected. The Conservatives tabled their own amendments and a new clause. The Government framed the measure as a response to what it described as a deteriorated fiscal inheritance, while opposition parties argued it broke explicit pre-election pledges not to raise National Insurance and would damage the very services the Government claimed to be protecting.
Voting Aye meant
Support passing the employer National Insurance rise into law, accepting it as a necessary revenue-raising measure
Voting No meant
Oppose the employer NI increase, arguing it harms small businesses, care providers, and growth sectors like life sciences
556 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 94 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
312
0
50
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
99
17
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
70
2
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
37
0
5
Independent
3
7
4
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
8
1
Reform UKWhipped No
0
3
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
—
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
1
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (1,623 words) →
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,131 words) →
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,967 words) →
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,256 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,634 words) →
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no · Read full speech (119 words) →
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,089 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,762 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0