National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: New Clause 1
195
Ayes
—
353
Noes
Defeated · Government won
104 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on 17 December 2024 on New Clause 1 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The new clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, sought to add protections or exemptions for certain businesses and organisations facing increased employer National Insurance contributions under the Bill. The motion was defeated by 353 votes to 195. **Why it matters:** The underlying Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, paid by employers, from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying. New Clause 1 would have limited the scope of those increases by carving out protections for specified sectors. Debate centred heavily on the impact of the rises on GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities and nurseries, all of which are privately operated but substantially funded through public commissioning. Opponents of the clause argued that rejecting it was necessary to protect public finances and fund NHS investment; supporters argued the rises would directly undermine the very services the government said it wanted to protect. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 347 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru all voted in favour of the new clause. There were no notable rebellions on the Labour benches. The vote sits within a broader contested narrative about the October 2024 Budget, with the opposition accusing the government of breaking pre-election pledges not to raise National Insurance, and the government arguing the rises were made necessary by inherited fiscal pressures.
Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative new clause opposing or restricting the government's employer National Insurance increase, arguing Labour broke its election promise not to raise National Insurance
Voting No meant
Reject the Conservative new clause and support the government's employer National Insurance rise as a necessary measure to fund public services
548 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 104 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
310
52
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
69
0
3
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
37
5
Independent
6
3
5
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
—
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words) →
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words) →
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words) →
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words) →
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words) →
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words) →
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0