Division · No. 71Tuesday, 17 December 2024Commons Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 23

196
Ayes
352
Noes
Defeated · Government won
104 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 17 December 2024, the House of Commons sitting in Committee of the whole House voted on Amendment 23 to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill. The amendment would have modified the employer National Insurance contribution increases set out in the Bill, aiming to reduce the burden on certain employers. The amendment was defeated by 352 votes to 196. **Why it matters:** The Bill raises the rate of secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions, paid by employers, from 13.8% to 15%, while also lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying those contributions. Amendment 23 sought to carve out or reduce that burden for specific categories of employer. The debate focused heavily on the effect of the increases on GP surgeries, care homes, hospices, charities, nurseries and small businesses, all of which are either privately run or voluntary-sector organisations that cannot easily absorb higher payroll costs. Critics argued that sectors already under financial strain would face cuts to staffing and services as a direct consequence of higher employer National Insurance bills, with knock-on effects for NHS capacity and social care provision. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 346 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government by voting no, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party and Plaid Cymru all voted aye. Seven independents voted aye and three voted no. The Scottish National Party sent only one member to vote, who voted aye. There were no notable rebels on either side. The debate took place against the backdrop of Opposition accusations that the government had broken pre-election promises not to raise National Insurance, while the government defended the measure as necessary to repair what it described as a damaged fiscal inheritance from the Conservatives.

Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a reduced secondary National Insurance rate for qualifying employments, protecting certain employers or workers from the full impact of the NI increase
Voting No meant
Oppose the reduced rate exemption, backing the government's approach of applying the increased employer NI contributions uniformly without special carve-outs
§ 01Who voted how.548 voting members · 104 absent
Aye195No350DID NOT VOTE · 104

548 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 104 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
310
52
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
101
0
15
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
70
0
2
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
36
6
Independent
7
3
4
Scottish National Party
1
0
8
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Pippa HeylingsOpposedSouth Cambridgeshire
Opposes the Bill; warns it will devastate GPs, care homes, and hospices already under strain and undermine efforts to move healthcare into the community.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,623 words)
Joe MorrisSupportiveHexham
Supports the Bill as necessary to repair public finances and rebuild NHS following Conservative mismanagement; rejects claims of unintended damage to frontline services.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,131 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Opposes the Bill; argues it breaks manifesto promises and will force 940,000 employers to pay an average £26,000 more, harming services and employment, particularly in healthcare and childcare.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,967 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Opposes the Bill; questions how taxing GPs, care homes, and hospices aligns with NHS support; demands government clarify funding source and impact on employment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,256 words)
Yuan YangSupportiveEarley and Woodley
Supports the Bill; argues a simplified, consistent tax approach is preferable to sector-by-sector exemptions; emphasizes employment allowance protects 865,000 smallest employers.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,634 words)
Carla DenyerQuestioningBristol Central
Questions government's approach; notes five GP surgeries warned NI increase will undermine patient care and that contract negotiations are too slow for urgent staffing decisions.Green Party · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (119 words)
Sorcha EastwoodOpposedLagan Valley
Opposes the Bill for Northern Ireland; argues healthcare, social care, hospices, and community sectors are uniquely vulnerable and should be exempted given regional funding strain.Ulster Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,089 words)
Chris CurtisSupportiveMilton Keynes North
Supports the Bill; argues it funds essential services and crime prevention; rejects Opposition claims as 'fantasy economics' without acknowledging Conservative legacy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,762 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0