The local authorityCouncil · county · england · 1 of 21 councils (county)

Gloucestershire County Council.

Council with no overall control county. £621m net revenue. 138 wards across 7 parliamentary constituencies. Comprises 6 districts: Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Gloucester, Stroud, Tewkesbury.

Typecounty
Seats0 councillors · 138 wards
Net revenue · 2025-26
£621m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
/0
Westminster
7
constituencies overlap · 3 MP parties
Dispatch
8 Jun 2026

Council chamber, 3-party MP geography.

Gloucestershire County Council is a county with no overall control. Net revenue is £621m for 2025-26. It covers 138 wards spanning 7 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 3 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§Districts.6 districts · Band D £2,227–£2,369
DistrictBand D billCounty tax sourcedWards
Cheltenham£2,258.28£73.8m20
Cotswold£2,276.70£72.4m32
Forest of Dean£2,326.88£53.2m21
Gloucester£2,246.16£66.5m18
Stroud£2,369.37£79.8m27
Tewkesbury£2,226.55£64.2m20

Band D is the full household bill (county + district + police + fire + parish). “County tax sourced” is Gloucestershire County Council’s own precept (£1679.65/yr at Band D) collected through each district’s tax base — totalling £409.9m.

§ 01Composition.0 seats

Who sits in the chamber.

Councillors — the people.

Councillor data not yet ingested for Gloucestershire County Council.

§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

66%
Council tax
£409.9m · median 66%
26%
Central grants
£163.8m · median 27%
8%
Business rates
£47.6m · median 7%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (county) median: 66% council tax, 26% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,680

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.11 buckets · vs 20 other councils (county)

How does Gloucestershire County Council split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (county)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education42.1% of net spend · cohort median 40%
6 of 21+4% vs median
Adult Social Care26.5% of net spend · cohort median 31%
19 of 21-16% vs median
Children's Services15.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
2 of 21+15% vs median
Highways & Transport5.3% of net spend · cohort median 4%
2 of 21+32% vs median
Corporate & Central3.0% of net spend · cohort median 1%
2 of 21+114% vs median
Protective Services2.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
3 of 9+4% vs median
Public Health2.8% of net spend · cohort median 3%
17 of 21-18% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.1% of net spend · cohort median 1%
4 of 21+20% vs median
Waste & Recycling0.6% of net spend · cohort median 3%
21 of 21-83% vs median
Housing & Homelessness0.0% of net spend · cohort median 0%
15 of 18-92% vs median
Planning & Economic Development-0.2% of net spend · cohort median 0%
19 of 21-166% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.17,924 payments · £74.5m gross · 3 Dec 202529 Dec 2025

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
RINGWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LIM£5.62m7.5%101
FCC (GLOUCESTERSHIRE) LTD£3.00m4.0%1
REDACTED PERSONAL INFORMATION£2.82m3.8%3,846
GALLIFORD TRY CONSTRUCTION LIMITED£1.53m2.1%8
WSP UK LTD£1.29m1.7%99
SAND ACADEMIES TRUST£1.02m1.4%21
PROSPERITY CARE & WELLBEING LTD£1.02m1.4%106
TARMAC TRADING LTD£0.98m1.3%22
NETWORK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS£0.97m1.3%143
COMENSURA LIMITED£0.92m1.2%606

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Planning And EconomicRINGWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LIM£3.82m
Corporate And CentralRINGWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LIM£1.79m
Childrens ServicesREDACTED PERSONAL INFORMATION£1.40m
Adult Social CareREDACTED PERSONAL INFORMATION£1.20m
Public HealthPREPAID FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD£0.30m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.138 wards split across 7 parliamentary seats

Gloucestershire County Council’s territory crosses 7 Westminster constituencies, with 3 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
North Cotswolds2317% Geoffrey Clifton-BrownCon
Forest of Dean2216% Matt BishopLab
Stroud2115% Simon OpherLab
South Cotswolds1914% Roz SavageLD
Tewkesbury1914% Cameron ThomasLD
Cheltenham1813% Max WilkinsonLD
Gloucester1612% Alex McIntyreLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 3 LD, 3 Lab and 1 Con MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a -controlled county — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 20 other councils (county)
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
17,924 payments · 3 Dec 202529 Dec 2025
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level