The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 556 contributions

Speeches by Lightwood.

Every Hansard contribution by Simon Lightwood this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 281300 of 556 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 15 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Desmond. The Bill recognises that commercial operators can play a key role in providing commercial services that complement franchising schemes and add value to the overall bus offer for local transport users. That includes cross-boundary services, which provide cruc

transportlocal-government
465
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

As I said in my opening remarks, clause 1 does not account for the full scope of the Government’s ambition. The shadow Minister talked about incentives; I think the incentives for local authorities are really clear, if not the clearest. They know what is best for their local areas. They are driven by the desire to tack

transportlocal-government
213
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I concede that, at the moment, it tends to be city regions that are looking at franchising, which is why we are doing the pilots to ensure that we have the template approach. We will learn the lessons from the various different franchising models that could be used. As we announced at the spending review, York and Nort

transportlocal-government
534
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

What the shadow Minister failed to hear in my previous remarks is that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to buses. This could be done through franchising; it could be done through municipal bus companies or local authority-operated bus companies; or it could be done through strengthened enhanced partnerships. Let

transportlocal-government
321
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I will try not to repeat the comments that I have made already, but I will say to the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham, that yes, the Conservative Government did put franchising in place. They also ensured that it was near impossible to achieve, as there were so many barriers. Instead of play

transportlocal-government
136
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Clause 2 removes the requirement for local transport authorities that are not mayoral combined authorities or mayoral combined county authorities to gain the Secretary of State’s consent to start the franchising process. The measure puts all local transport authorities on a level playing field. It also removes from the

transportlocal-government
608
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Roger. I think I speak for the majority of Committee members in saying that, as this is my first Bill Committee, I will be guided by your experience and that of the Clerks. This clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to have regard to the purpose of the Bill,

transportlocal-government
777
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I thought the Liberal Democrats were the party of devolution, but they have a strange habit of wanting to tell local areas what to do and how to do it. Rural bus hubs are not yet widespread and the available data on their impact is limited. I have already outlined that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to improvin

transportlocal-government
276
23 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

The clause enhances the flexibility of franchising in terms of the areas that can be brought into such a scheme. The Government understand that there is a lack of clarity about whether a franchising scheme may specify more than one non-contiguous area. The clause therefore clarifies that that is permissible, meaning th

transportlocal-government
332
1 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords]

I thank all Members for their participation in today’s lively debate, spanning across the House. I do not intend to take interventions due to time, and out of courtesy to Members who have spoken already, I intend to respond as best as I can. I would like, first of all, to wish my hon. Friend the Member for Dunstable an

transportlocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
1,377
15 May 2025 Stockport Railway Station

My hon. Friend is quite right, and I hear what he says, but it is important that we point out the wider investment in the rail system there, including the £1.1 million to refurnish the iconic Stockport viaduct, which was built back in 1840. Let me move on to the issue of step-free access at Brinnington, Heaton Chapel a

transportlocal-government
514
15 May 2025 Stockport Railway Station

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Stockport (Navendu Mishra) on securing the debate and providing the opportunity to discuss Stockport railway station. I thank the hon. Member for Hazel Grove (Lisa Smart) and my hon. Friend the Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch (Dame Meg Hillier) for their intervention

transportlocal-government
305
15 May 2025 Stockport Railway Station

I want to see a railway and a transport system across the country that are accessible to everybody. I will take away my hon. Friend’s comments on this individual case and discuss it further with the Rail Minister. I also thank my hon. Friend the Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch. I am happy to meet with her to di

transportlocal-government
208
15 May 2025 Stockport Railway Station

We obviously want to see growth in every corner of the country, and we are awaiting the spending review outcomes, as is everybody else. We are aware that our partners will have their own priorities for the future of railways in their areas, and we are open to engaging with them directly on their plans. The core aim of

transportlocal-government
247
14 May 2025Topical Questions

I have to say, I really enjoyed my appearance at the Select Committee yesterday. Ultimately, we want people to choose to take the bus because it provides better connections in every part of the country to get people where they need be. It is a more reliable, more affordable, faster and more integrated form of transport

transporteconomy-jobs
74
14 May 2025Topical Questions

Southeastern plans services to meet passenger demand while ensuring value for money for the taxpayer. Timetables are kept under review and can be adjusted to reflect fluctuations in demand. I am pleased to say that four additional weekday evening services will be introduced on the route in December.

transporteconomy-jobs
48
14 May 2025Topical Questions

Improving bus connectivity in rural areas is vital for kick-starting growth. Our Bus Services (No. 2) Bill will give local leaders the powers they need for their communities, including in Northumberland, which as part of the North East combined authority was allocated £23 million in 2025-26 to improve services.

transporteconomy-jobs
49
14 May 2025Topical Questions

I hope the Tees Valley Mayor is looking at the great work that Labour mayors are already doing across the country to transform public transport in their regions.

transporteconomy-jobs
28
14 May 2025Topical Questions

I am more than happy to meet my hon. Friend to discuss this further.

transporteconomy-jobs
14
14 May 2025Topical Questions

Chiltern Railways faces challenges with ageing trains and is engaged in commercial negotiations to replace its oldest Mark 3 carriages. The Department is collaborating with Chiltern to ensure that the procurement delivers long-term passenger benefits. Separately, the Chiltern Class 168 fleet is undergoing significant r

transporteconomy-jobs
53
← PreviousPage 15 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.