The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 556 contributions

Speeches by Lightwood.

Every Hansard contribution by Simon Lightwood this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 301320 of 556 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 16 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 May 2025Rail Access: Grimsby and Cleethorpes

My hon. Friend is a huge advocate for her constituency. Any additional services will be dependent on funding from the spending review. The Rail Minister will meet my hon. Friend to discuss the proposals further, following the conclusion of the spending review. The Department continues to review the application from Gra

transporteconomy-jobs
84
14 May 2025Rail Access: Grimsby and Cleethorpes

Subject to final industry planning, East Midlands Railway plans to introduce an all-day direct Nottingham-Cleethorpes service in December, improving connections at Lincoln for journeys to London. The Rail Minister has been looking closely into possible direct trains between London and Cleethorpes, and looks forward to

transporteconomy-jobs
55
14 May 2025Rail Access: Grimsby and Cleethorpes

As I said, a decision is ultimately a matter for the regulator. Open access can provide benefits such as improved connectivity and choice for passengers, but it can also increase costs to taxpayers and create additional performance pressures on an already constrained network. The Department will always look at applicat

transporteconomy-jobs
60
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We talked about the Bus Centre of Excellence in terms of getting individuals together to share best practice. We are incentivising that through our consolidated funding to local areas. We are setting a really high ambition with the public for better connections to places that people need to get to and for reliability,

96
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

As I said, we are having discussions, and we will be engaging with the sector when we come to a decision on that.

23
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Not before 2030.

3
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Exactly. We will be looking at that, obviously. I visited Wrightbus not so long ago. They do some great work. They do great work in the re-powering market as well, which is a really exciting innovation where they transform old diesel buses and give them another decade of life by converting them into electric buses. We

188
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We have been really clear that that will be not before 2030. We have big ambitions when it comes to decarbonising our public transport. We want to do that with the industry. I do not want to put undue pressure on them. There are a lot of diesel buses out there at the moment. Q296       Dr

74
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

It goes back to that evidence base. At the moment, if one in five are failing the test, that risk is something we could not tolerate.

26
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

—on driving licensing, including D1. The feedback then was that, while there was support for looking at D1, there was not sufficient evidence to suggest it would improve driver recruitment, and not enough evidence to suggest that it would not introduce extra risk when it comes to safety. We absolutely do not want road

135
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

There was, under the previous Government, a call for evidence in 2022 or 2023—

14
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

With any change, you want to ensure that safety is of paramount importance and you understand any unintended consequences. I am not saying this would happen, but if there was a reduction in the number of people capable of driving these buses, what are the consequences for schools’ ability to get their children to enjoy

90
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I am afraid my colleague is going to be disappointed in my answer. This is really a matter for the Treasury. We have passed on the concerns of the sector to the Treasury to make sure they take that under advisement. VAT policy is a matter for my colleagues in the Treasury.

52
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I know it is complicated. I can see a case where we would review it. However, we would need to be very careful to understand the unintended consequences. Safety should always be paramount in any decision. It is complicated already. There is potential for unpicking that and making it even more complicated. It might be w

76
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Sure. I recognise that there are significant concerns in the sector. We have shared that information from DRT providers with our colleagues in the Treasury. Ultimately, VAT policy is a matter for the Treasury, but we have made sure that those representations have got to where they need to go.

50
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We are creating best practice guidance as a result of the trials that have been undertaken under the rural mobility fund. That is based on insights from the trials and from experienced local transport authorities that have been successful in creating effective DRT solutions. The first piece of guidance should be later

96
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Alternative service models are important for ensuring that communities have access to transport where traditional services may not be working or are not viable. Both DRT, demand-responsive transport, and crucially—it is important to emphasise this—community transport, of which I am a big fan, can fill the gaps where tr

149
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We and local transport authorities need to recognise that people do not exist in a bubble. They may live in one area and work in another, so it is in everybody’s interests that we work together collaboratively to break down any barriers when it comes to cross-boundary work.

48
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We are giving more powers to local leaders in the bus services Bill. We expect them to work with each other and to think creatively with nearby authorities. That will be important when they redesign their networks to meet local needs. For example, the Bill will let franchising authorities give permits to operators who

215
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I don’t think that it is necessarily a silver bullet. Devolution is an exciting opportunity, and we have seen fantastic progress in places such as Greater Manchester, which obviously has franchised its network already. The bus Bill gives areas more power to improve their bus services, including new options such as crea

58
← PreviousPage 16 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.