The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 453 contributions

Speeches by Kohler.

Every Hansard contribution by Paul Kohler this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 221240 of 453 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 12 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for those comments on our amendment, but what is the point of including anything in proposed new subsection (2) then? Following his argument, nothing needs to be there.

transportlocal-government
33
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting)

Clause 28 introduces powers for local authorities to make byelaws for buses. That is welcome, and I agree that the behaviour that the clause already lists should be prohibited. There is, however, a clear omission. With passengers already paying extortionate fares to be packed in like sardines on buses, we should at lea

transportlocal-government
797
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting)

Is there not a contradiction? Subsection (2) seems to suggest that there are ways of designing out the problem, whereas subsection (1) bans all new floating bus stops. If subsection (1) were offering a moratorium until the design issues had been addressed, we could support it, but subsections (1) and (2) do not sit wel

transportlocal-government
58
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

In answer to the hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham, our new clause 23 addresses the weaknesses in the existing clause 21. According to research by the National Centre for Accessible Transport, 90% of disabled bus users report facing barriers to using the bus network. Those include space constraints, poorly designe

transportlocal-government
433
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

The clause, added during scrutiny in the Lords, is a welcome and valuable improvement to the Bill, but we would like to know what consultation was held with disabled groups before it was drafted. Although the changes it makes might seem modest on paper, they have the potential to make a significant difference in improv

transportlocal-government
255
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

New clause 37 is sensible and constructive. It would ensure that when enhanced partnership schemes are amended, improved integration across modes of public transport is explicitly recognised as a legitimate and desirable reason for doing so. We have seen time and again, both here in the UK and internationally, that whe

transportlocal-government
117
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

I will press it to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be made.

transportlocal-government
14
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

Clause 14 is so important, because it is about socially necessary routes—those that are critical to the community. It explicitly includes employment and, as the Minister conceded last week, also catches things such as hospital appointments, GP appointments and education. Throughout the Committee stage, the Minister has

transportlocal-government
781
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

We remain of the view that without the amendment, the proposals will not give small bus companies the benefits that we are seeking to achieve. We are not convinced that that can be done without the explicit mention of small bus companies, as provided by the amendment.

transportlocal-government
47
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

We welcome the powers in clause 23, which enables local transport authorities to design and deliver grants directly to bus operators in their areas. It is a clear step in the right direction, placing real tools in the hands of local authorities, which know their communities best and are best placed to shape the service

transportlocal-government
210
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 56, in clause 23, page 18, line 42, at end insert— “154B Consideration of operator size in grant allocation (1) When exercising powers under section 154A, a local transport authority in England may have regard to the size of the operator when determining the amount of a grant and the conditions

transportlocal-government
173
30 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting)

I completely agree with the hon. Member. With the welcome increase in active travel and the number of cyclists, we need to address the conflicts that arise on the road. If one goes to the continent, it is part of their DNA—cyclists, motorists and pedestrians understand their relationship—but the same is not true in thi

transportlocal-government
236
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dr Allin-Khan. My party has little to say on this group. We are supportive of clauses 5 and 6, although the hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham made a good point, and we would like to hear the Minister’s views on it.

transportlocal-government
51
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

Is the Minister confident that that money is sufficient to protect socially necessary services?

transportlocal-government
14
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir Desmond. While I am broadly supportive of much of the Bill, we must not lose sight of the fundamental challenge—the lack of sufficient funding and expertise in local authorities to fully take advantage of the powers that it provides.

transportlocal-government
49
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

I beg to move amendment 57, in clause 10, page 6, line 6, at end insert— “(A1) Section 123B of the Transport Act 2000 (assessment of proposed scheme) is amended in accordance with subsections (A2) to (A4). (A2) In subsection (2)(a) omit ‘and’; (A3) In subsection (2)(b), after ‘action’ insert— ‘, and (c) assess the adeq

transportlocal-government
168
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I fear that is true. I do not think they are subsidising—I think they are coming in and taking a profit, and I absolutely agree.

transportlocal-government
25
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I heard the shadow Minister say that, and I understand it. However, there is a contradiction in his analysis. He admits that point, but constantly refers to consumers operating in profit-and-loss markets. He is making a very narrow equation, and I fear that allowing public providers in the way he wants would simply und

transportlocal-government
85
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I will be more brief. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.”] I have two points to make. I suspect that many of the shadow Minister’s points could be drawn from Hansard 40 years ago when bus deregulation was introduced. The great flaw of bus deregulation was it allowed private providers to cherry-pick profitable routes, leaving

transportlocal-government
153
25 Jun 2025Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

I beg to move amendment 54, in clause 14, page 10, line 26, at end insert— “(4A) Where a socially necessary route has been identified in accordance with section 138A(15) of the Transport Act 2000, and no alternative operator has implemented the service within a period of six months, the relevant local authority must ta

transportlocal-government
334
← PreviousPage 12 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.