The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 949 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Greg Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 661680 of 949 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 34 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I have a straightforward question. We are back once more with our old friend of not having full clarity and having consultation after legislation. The Minister gave a figure, but it is not clear exactly what the Secretary of State might consider specifying as the maximum compensation that can be awarded under this meas

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
140
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Twelfth sitting)

I understand the point that the hon. Gentleman makes. He is right that the businesses in the situation he describes would have to go through a legal process, probably involving very expensive contract lawyers, to alter such a contract. I do not think it is helpful to directly compare those supply chain contracts with e

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
173
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Twelfth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 127, in clause 22, page 33, line 12, leave out from “that” to end of line 21 and insert— “the reason for the variation was to provide for improved employment practices and to update and reform outdated working practices, in order to allow for the more effective running of a business or organisat

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
558
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Of course there will always be some who look for loopholes, but I gently suggest that the vast majority do not. They are good employers who care for their workforce, because, as we have discussed many times over, no business is anything at all without both parts—the workforce and those who risk their capital and so on

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
185
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point. He likes to point to the profit lines of many of those businesses. Just because a business is making a substantial profit does not necessarily mean that it does not have to go through significant change in businesses practices in meeting market demands, manufacturing processes a

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
250
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I will speak briefly to amendments 160 and 161, standing in the name of the hon. Member for Dundee Central and the Scottish National party. These amendments seek to make the fire and rehire provisions more restrictive, saying that employers cannot vary contracts or re-engage staff on different contracts “to eliminate,

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
205
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

The Minister tempts me, but I will set out our rationale for new clause 28 and amendment 134. I acknowledge that he has published a series of impact assessments, but the Regulatory Policy Committee has not exactly given the Bill a glowing bill of health, and there are a significant number of red ratings in its assessme

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
518
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

As I hope I made clear in my opening remarks, amendment 155 is a probing amendment. I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
29
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I do not disagree with what the hon. Gentleman says, but where we do disagree is on the conclusions that we draw from that. I would strongly argue that to introduce primary legislation without an adequate evidence base is foolish, whereas he seems to be arguing that it is fine to do that. I fundamentally agree with the

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
250
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Amendment 155 would make the initial period of employment six months, to align with a standard probationary period. The Government have admitted that they do not have robust data on instances of dismissal for those under two years of employment; in other words, we do not know if there is even a problem with unfair dism

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
105
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 155, in schedule 2, page 112, line 23, after “period” insert “of no less than six months”. This amendment makes the initial period of employment at least six months in length.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
36
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
13
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. This pair of amendments on unfair dismissal stand in my name and those of my hon. Friends from the official Opposition. Amendment 156 would make the fact that the employee was made redundant a reason in relation to the dismissal of an employee during the initia

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
397
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 156, in schedule 2, page 112, line 19, after (b) insert “, (c)”. This amendment makes the reason that the employee was redundant a reason in relation to the dismissal of an employee during the initial period of employment.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
44
12 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Where does the Minister think the cost to businesses will be borne? Will it mean lower wages for employees, no Christmas bonuses or perhaps pay rises that are not as great as employees might be expecting? Or will it ultimately get passed on to customers, consumers and purchasers of the services that those businesses pr

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
62
11 Dec 2024Draft Road Transport (International Passenger Services) (Amendment) Regulations 2024

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. As the Minister has stressed, the Interbus agreement is a long-standing agreement that ensures access for bus providers. Rightly, it has always been the policy of the Department for Transport to maintain that access throughout our evolving relationship with

transport
336
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I understand the point that the hon. Lady makes. I am the last person to want to put a greater burden or unnecessary burden on any form of business. All I gently suggest is that this probably is not that great a burden on a business, on the grounds that it will already know what it is going to do when an employee comes

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
200
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Tenth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is right about the unfair dismissal point. Nobody wants to see anybody unfairly dismissed, but it is impossible to see each measure in the Bill in its own silo or its own column; each is part of the cumulative impact of many measures reverting to day one rights. So, too, is the measure before us, and

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
170
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for that. It may well be such an example. I must admit I resisted the urge to attend The Spectator awards last week. I am told the Health Secretary did make what many considered a very funny speech. However, it is clear that some deem it uncomradely. Who knows? Had this legislation already been e

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
108
10 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Ninth sitting)

How can I say no to the offer of an excellent example from my hon. Friend?

labour-marketeconomy-jobssocial-care
16
← PreviousPage 34 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.