§ 00 Issue10 named divisions3 bills

Skills and Training

Vocational training and apprenticeships

§ 01How parties voted12 parties

Government alignment shows how often each party voted with the government's stated position. Issue-aligned direction shows agreement with the AI-identified supportive stance.

§ 02Bills & votesGrouped by bill
31 Mar 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords]: Third ReadingAye = Support passing the Bill to transfer apprenticeships and technical education functions, accepting the government's approach without requiring additional parliamentary approval for establishing Skills England · No = Oppose passing the Bill without stronger parliamentary oversight, arguing Parliament should vote to approve the structure and proposals for Skills England before it is formally established308 · 64Passed31 Mar 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 1Aye = Support making Skills England an independent statutory body outside any single government department, to improve cross-departmental authority and parliamentary accountability · No = Oppose the amendment, preferring Skills England to remain as an executive agency within a government department as originally planned170 · 305Defeated31 Mar 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4Aye = Support requiring a one-year delay before Skills England can be fully established, arguing more time is needed to assess the impact on apprenticeships including degree apprenticeships and T levels · No = Oppose the delay, arguing that waiting a year risks recreating the old system under a new name and that Skills England needs to be established quickly to deliver real benefits to vocational education169 · 305Defeated31 Mar 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 6Aye = Support giving Skills England a one-year operational period before it takes on IfATE's functions, arguing this cautious approach reduces implementation risk and protects apprenticeship and technical education quality during the transition. · No = Oppose the delay, preferring to proceed with the transfer of functions without a mandated one-year waiting period, prioritising swift delivery of the new skills system.166 · 308Defeated25 Feb 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill: Reasoned Amendment on Second ReadingAye = Support blocking the Bill, expressing concern about the government's approach to reforming apprenticeships and the skills levy rather than accepting the Bill as presented. · No = Support allowing the Bill to proceed, backing the government's plan to reform the apprenticeship levy into a flexible growth and skills levy to address skills gaps in the economy.72 · 314Defeated25 Feb 2025Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill: Second ReadingAye = Support creating Skills England and reforming the apprenticeship levy to give employers more flexibility in funding training, aiming to close skills gaps and drive economic growth · No = Oppose the Bill at this stage, potentially concerned about the pace of reform, the effectiveness of the proposed changes, or the handling of the apprenticeship levy319 · 57Passed
How is this calculated?

Government alignment shows how often a party's MPs voted with the government's stated position on this issue. This is the most comparable metric across parties, as it measures the same reference point for everyone.

Issue-aligned direction shows how often MPs voted in the direction tagged as supportive of this issue by AI analysis. For example, if a vote is tagged “pro-environment”, an Aye vote counts as aligned.

Sources
Commons Votes APIcommonsvotes-api.parliament.uk
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0
AI analysisVote stance tagging · Claude 4.x