Division · No. 419Tuesday, 27 January 2026Commons Health

Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 2

61
Ayes
311
Noes
Defeated · Government won
275 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened**: On 27 January 2026, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 2 to the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill at committee stage. The amendment was defeated by 311 votes to 61. The amendment was tabled by the Liberal Democrats and related to concerns about ministerial powers under the Bill -- specifically the use of the "negative procedure" (a parliamentary process that allows secondary legislation to pass without a full debate or vote unless MPs object) to change who qualifies for prioritisation in medical training. The Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, and a handful of independents voted in favour; Labour, Labour and Co-operative, the DUP, and Ulster Unionist Party voted against. The Conservatives were entirely absent from this division. **Why it matters**: The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill aims to give priority to graduates of UK and Irish medical schools when allocating foundation and specialty training places in the NHS. Amendment 2 sought to require that any future changes to who qualifies for prioritisation be subject to greater parliamentary oversight, rather than being made by the Secretary of State alone through the negative procedure. In practical terms, the amendment's defeat means that the Government retains the power to redefine the eligibility criteria for prioritisation without Parliament needing to vote on those changes. Critics argued this could allow Ministers to quietly redraw access to NHS training posts without meaningful democratic scrutiny -- a significant matter given that training places are a gateway to NHS careers for thousands of doctors. **The politics**: The vote split broadly along government versus opposition lines, though with notable asymmetry. Labour and its Co-operative partners voted unanimously against the amendment, reflecting the Government's position that ministerial flexibility was necessary. The Liberal Democrats, who have expressed general support for the Bill's objectives, nonetheless voted as a bloc in favour -- arguing that accountability and transparency warranted stronger parliamentary controls. Plaid Cymru and the Greens also backed the amendment. The Conservatives, despite having tabled their own amendments to the Bill on the same day, were entirely absent from this particular division -- a striking gap given the party's size. The vote sits within a broader debate about the appropriate balance between executive discretion and parliamentary scrutiny in NHS workforce policy, a theme that has run through several amendments to this Bill.

Voting Aye meant
Support returning to a merit-based system for NHS specialty training, where doctors' exam results and academic performance are rewarded when allocating training places
Voting No meant
Oppose reintroducing merit-based allocation to specialty training, preferring the current system which does not rank candidates by academic achievement
§ 01Who voted how.372 voting members · 275 absent
Aye63No311DID NOT VOTE · 275

372 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 275 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
276
86
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
27
15
Independent
2
3
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.5 principal speakers
Karin SmythSupportiveBristol South
Supports the Bill as drafted; opposes most amendments as they would widen the priority pool, undermine workforce planning, or create loopholes; defends the discretionary commencement clause as necessary for effective NHS implementation.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,610 words)
Dr Caroline JohnsonNeutralSleaford and North Hykeham
Supports the Bill's principles but tables amendments to protect British citizens trained overseas, safeguard armed forces medics, require annual reporting on international student impacts, and ensure merit-based allocation of specific training places.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,984 words)
Helen MorganNeutralNorth Shropshire
Supports the Bill but tables amendments to replace negative with affirmative procedure for future regulations, protect 2026 applicants mid-cycle, require annual impact reporting by medical specialty, and ensure devolved consent on regulatory changes.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (734 words)
Dr Ben SpencerQuestioningRunnymede and Weybridge
Strongly opposes the current preference informed allocation system as meritless and dehumanising; supports new clause 2 requiring merit-based allocation of candidates to specific training places after prioritisation requirements are met.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (469 words)
Helen MaguireQuestioningEpsom and Ewell
Intervenes to support new clause 1, raising concerns that the Bill could exacerbate workforce shortages in specialties like oncology and radiology without specialty-specific impact assessment.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (100 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0