Division · No. 161Monday, 31 March 2025Commons Skills and Training

Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 1

168
Ayes
302
Noes
Defeated · Government won
174 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 31 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 1 during the Report Stage of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords]. The new clause, which sought to add enhanced parliamentary scrutiny and stakeholder consultation requirements to the bill, was defeated by 302 votes to 168. **Why it matters:** The bill transfers the functions of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) to the Secretary of State and other bodies, effectively reshaping how apprenticeship standards and technical education qualifications are developed and overseen in England. New Clause 1 would have imposed additional requirements on how that transfer was conducted, giving Parliament and stakeholders a greater formal role in the process. Its defeat means the government can proceed with its streamlined approach to absorbing IfATE's responsibilities without those extra procedural obligations, affecting employers, training providers, and the millions of people who participate in apprenticeship and technical education programmes. **The politics:** The vote split along clear party lines. All 301 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause, while Conservatives (94), Liberal Democrats (64), Reform UK (4), the DUP (4), the Greens (3), and the Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted in favour. There were no notable cross-party rebels. This division was one of several on the same day during Report Stage, with related votes on Amendment 6 and New Clause 4 producing nearly identical results, suggesting a coordinated opposition push that the government comfortably repelled using its Commons majority. The bill subsequently passed its Third Reading by 304 votes to 62.

Voting Aye meant
Support making Skills England an independent statutory body outside any single government department, to improve cross-departmental authority and parliamentary accountability
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, preferring Skills England to remain as an executive agency within a government department as originally planned
§ 01Who voted how.470 voting members · 174 absent
Aye170No305DID NOT VOTE · 174

470 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 174 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
265
97
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
36
6
Independent
0
3
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Ian SollomOpposedSt Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,508 words)
Damian HindsOpposedEast Hampshire
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,550 words)
Andrew PakesSupportivePeterborough
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,604 words)
Pam CoxSupportiveColchester
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (508 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (714 words)
Toby PerkinsSupportiveChesterfield
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,954 words)
Peter SwallowSupportiveBracknell
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (816 words)
Laurence TurnerSupportiveBirmingham Northfield
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,315 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0