Division · No. 164Monday, 31 March 2025Commons Skills and Training

Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords]: Third Reading

304
Ayes
62
Noes
Passed · Government won
277 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 31 March 2025 to give final approval to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill at Third Reading, passing it by 304 votes to 62. Third Reading is the last opportunity for the House of Commons to approve a bill in its final form before it becomes law. The bill transfers the functions of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) to the Secretary of State and to Skills England, a new body the government is establishing to oversee technical education and apprenticeships in England. The practical effect of the bill is to abolish IfATE as a standalone arm's-length body and bring its responsibilities directly under ministerial control, with day-to-day delivery passing to Skills England. IfATE has been responsible since 2017 for approving apprenticeship standards, overseeing technical qualifications, and working with employers on skills needs. The change affects apprentices, employers, training providers, and the broader further education sector across England. The government argues the restructuring will produce a more coherent and responsive skills system; critics have argued it concentrates power with ministers and reduces independent oversight of apprenticeship quality. The vote divided largely along government-versus-opposition lines, with Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voting unanimously in favour, joined by the Greens, several independents, and the smaller Northern Irish unionist parties. The Liberal Democrats were the only party to vote against, providing all 62 No votes. The Conservatives were absent from the division, having opposed the bill at Second Reading in February 2025 when they tabled a reasoned amendment attracting 70 votes. The bill had already cleared the House of Lords before arriving in the Commons, and report stage amendments tabled on the same day, 31 March 2025, were each defeated by margins of roughly 300 to 167.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Bill to transfer apprenticeships and technical education functions, accepting the government's approach without requiring additional parliamentary approval for establishing Skills England
Voting No meant
Oppose passing the Bill without stronger parliamentary oversight, arguing Parliament should vote to approve the structure and proposals for Skills England before it is formally established
§ 01Who voted how.366 voting members · 277 absent
Aye308No64DID NOT VOTE · 277

366 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 277 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
264
0
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
64
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
34
0
8
Independent
3
0
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Ian SollomOpposedSt Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,508 words)
Damian HindsOpposedEast Hampshire
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,550 words)
Andrew PakesSupportivePeterborough
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,604 words)
Pam CoxSupportiveColchester
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (508 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words)
Toby PerkinsSupportiveChesterfield
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,954 words)
Peter SwallowSupportiveBracknell
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (816 words)
Laurence TurnerSupportiveBirmingham Northfield
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,315 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0