Division · No. 162Monday, 31 March 2025Commons Skills and Training

Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4

167
Ayes
306
Noes
Defeated · Government won
175 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 31 March 2025 on whether to add a new clause (New Clause 4) to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill at Report Stage. The clause was proposed by the opposition and would have modified the government's plans for reforming the governance of skills and apprenticeships training. The motion was defeated by 306 votes to 167, meaning the clause was not added to the Bill. The Bill transfers the functions of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) to the Secretary of State and Skills England, a new body the government is creating to oversee technical education and apprenticeships. New Clause 4 sought to add conditions or protections to that transfer of functions. Its defeat means the government's original reform plan proceeds without the modifications the opposition sought, leaving the Secretary of State with broader direct control over the functions previously held by IfATE. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 299 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause, while the 95 Conservatives, 64 Liberal Democrats, 4 Reform UK members, 4 Democratic Unionist Party members, and both the Ulster Unionist and Traditional Unionist Voice representatives voted in favour. The Greens joined Labour in opposing the clause. This was one of several opposition amendments defeated on the same day during Report Stage, with similar results across related divisions on Amendment 6 and New Clause 1. The Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading on the same day by 304 votes to 62.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring a one-year delay before Skills England can be fully established, arguing more time is needed to assess the impact on apprenticeships including degree apprenticeships and T levels
Voting No meant
Oppose the delay, arguing that waiting a year risks recreating the old system under a new name and that Skills England needs to be established quickly to deliver real benefits to vocational education
§ 01Who voted how.473 voting members · 175 absent
Aye169No305DID NOT VOTE · 175

473 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 175 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
264
98
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
35
7
Independent
0
3
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Ian SollomOpposedSt Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,508 words)
Damian HindsOpposedEast Hampshire
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,550 words)
Andrew PakesSupportivePeterborough
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,604 words)
Pam CoxSupportiveColchester
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (508 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (714 words)
Toby PerkinsSupportiveChesterfield
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,954 words)
Peter SwallowSupportiveBracknell
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (816 words)
Laurence TurnerSupportiveBirmingham Northfield
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,315 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0