A divisionDivision No. 48 · Wednesday, 1 July 2026· Commons· Taxation

Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5

177Ayes
308Noes
Defeated · majority 131 · Government won
161 did not vote
Aye177No310DID NOT VOTE · 161

646 Members · Aye 177 · No 308 · DNV 161 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 1 July 2026, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 5 during the committee stage of the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill. The clause would have required the Government to report to Parliament on the financial impact of a temporary Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) rate for heavy goods vehicles, covering the effect on public finances, the competitiveness of the freight and logistics sector, the clause's contribution to supply chains, and whether the measure should continue beyond twelve months. The Commons rejected the clause by 308 votes to 177. The vote concerns a Government measure granting a temporary VED holiday for HGVs, introduced in response to the conflict in the Middle East and the disproportionate fuel cost burden on road haulage. New Clause 5 would not have reversed that policy but would have compelled the Treasury to publish a formal assessment of it before any decision to extend or end the measure. Rejecting it means no statutory obligation exists for such a review, though the Government noted the Office for Budget Responsibility will scrutinise the costing and that taxes and reliefs are considered ahead of each fiscal event. The vote divided entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 306 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the clause, while 95 Conservatives, 58 Liberal Democrats, and smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the SNP, Reform UK, and the DUP all voted in favour. The Greens voted no alongside the Government. The result mirrors a parallel division the same day, in which New Clause 4, requiring a review of the electricity generator levy, was also defeated by 282 to 173.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 5 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill, as proposed during committee stage
Voting No meant
Oppose adding New Clause 5 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill, rejecting the proposed addition
§ 01Who voted how.485 voting Members · 161 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
276
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
13
Independent
5
0
8
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
The Bill delivers targeted relief to households and businesses hit by Middle East conflict-driven energy and fuel costs; the levy rise is justified as capturing exceptional generator revenues without harming investment, and the measures represent good long-term economic management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,644 words)
James WildQuestioningNorth West Norfolk
The measures are welcome but lack clarity and coherence—the levy is raised without a published end date or pre-tested policy on decoupling electricity and gas prices, and the HGV relief is temporary with no long-term strategy; Parliament needs formal reviews to assess whether these short-term fixes actually work.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,833 words)
Daisy CooperNeutralSt Albans
The Government's measures are well-intentioned and the Lib Dems support them, but transparency matters for public trust; require reports on how levy revenue is spent, simplify the claims process for care workers, and assess the real impact of HGV relief on supply chains.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,017 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0