A divisionDivision No. 47 · Wednesday, 1 July 2026· Commons· Taxation

Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4

173Ayes
282Noes
Defeated · majority 109 · Government won
195 did not vote
Aye173No280DID NOT VOTE · 195

650 Members · Aye 173 · No 282 · DNV 195 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament defeated New Clause 4 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill on 1 July 2026, by 282 votes to 173. The clause had been tabled by Conservative MPs and sought to require the Treasury to review the impact of raising the electricity generator levy to 55% and to report findings to Parliament before 31 March 2028, including consideration of whether the levy should continue at that rate. The electricity generator levy was originally introduced as a temporary windfall tax on electricity generators during a period of exceptional market conditions. The Government is now raising the rate to 55%, and the new clause would have imposed a formal parliamentary review before that change beds in. Defeating it means no statutory obligation on ministers to assess the levy's impact or revisit its continuation on a set timetable, though the Government noted that the Office for Budget Responsibility will scrutinise the costing and that taxes are reviewed ahead of each fiscal event. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted opposed the clause, providing the 282 noes. All 96 voting Conservatives, all 56 voting Liberal Democrats, and smaller parties including Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the SNP, the DUP and Restore Britain backed it, together accounting for the 173 ayes. No cross-party defections were recorded. The result followed a similar pattern on the same day, when New Clause 2 (on mileage rates for care workers) fell 281 to 80, and New Clause 5 (on the HGV vehicle excise duty holiday) fell 308 to 177.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 4 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill
Voting No meant
Oppose adding New Clause 4 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill
§ 01Who voted how.455 voting Members · 195 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
251
109
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
56
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
14
Independent
3
0
10
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
5
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
The Bill delivers targeted relief to households and businesses hit by Middle East conflict-driven energy and fuel costs; the levy rise is justified as capturing exceptional generator revenues without harming investment, and the measures represent good long-term economic management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,644 words)
James WildQuestioningNorth West Norfolk
The measures are welcome but lack clarity and coherence—the levy is raised without a published end date or pre-tested policy on decoupling electricity and gas prices, and the HGV relief is temporary with no long-term strategy; Parliament needs formal reviews to assess whether these short-term fixes actually work.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,833 words)
Daisy CooperNeutralSt Albans
The Government's measures are well-intentioned and the Lib Dems support them, but transparency matters for public trust; require reports on how levy revenue is spent, simplify the claims process for care workers, and assess the real impact of HGV relief on supply chains.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,017 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0