A divisionDivision No. 46 · Wednesday, 1 July 2026· Commons· Taxation

Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2

80Ayes
281Noes
Defeated · majority 201 · Government won
288 did not vote
Aye81No280DID NOT VOTE · 288

649 Members · Aye 80 · No 281 · DNV 288 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament rejected New Clause 2 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill on 1 July 2026, voting 80 ayes to 281 noes. The clause, proposed during the Committee stage of the whole House, would have required the Chancellor of the Exchequer to publish, within six months of the Act passing, a review of the approved mileage allowance payment rate as it applies to care workers who use their own vehicles for work. The new clause would have asked the Government to assess whether the current rate of 55 pence per mile adequately covers the costs incurred by paid care workers travelling between clients' homes, and to consider whether a higher rate should apply to those transporting specialist equipment or making three or more care visits in a single day. It would also have required the review to examine the relationship between mileage reimbursement and whether care workers are, in practice, receiving the National Living Wage once travel costs are taken into account. The clause was promoted by Liberal Democrat MP Daisy Cooper, who argued that care workers' work and costs are insufficiently recognised. The Government minister Dan Tomlinson acknowledged the importance of the issue but said the Government preferred to look at simplifying the process by which care workers can claim existing tax relief, rather than committing to a formal review. The vote divided almost entirely along government and opposition lines. No Labour or Labour and Co-operative Party MPs voted for the clause, with 280 combined voting against. The Liberal Democrats provided 56 of the 80 ayes. Smaller opposition parties including Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, the SNP, Reform UK, and two Your Party MPs also voted in favour, as did four independents and one Conservative. The large number of absent Conservative MPs (115 of 116) meant the party had little practical effect on the outcome.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 2 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill at Committee stage
Voting No meant
Oppose New Clause 2, preferring the Bill to proceed without this addition
§ 01Who voted how.361 voting Members · 288 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
251
109
Conservative and Unionist Party
1
0
115
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
56
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
14
Independent
4
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
The Bill delivers targeted relief to households and businesses hit by Middle East conflict-driven energy and fuel costs; the levy rise is justified as capturing exceptional generator revenues without harming investment, and the measures represent good long-term economic management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,644 words)
James WildQuestioningNorth West Norfolk
The measures are welcome but lack clarity and coherence—the levy is raised without a published end date or pre-tested policy on decoupling electricity and gas prices, and the HGV relief is temporary with no long-term strategy; Parliament needs formal reviews to assess whether these short-term fixes actually work.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,833 words)
Daisy CooperNeutralSt Albans
The Government's measures are well-intentioned and the Lib Dems support them, but transparency matters for public trust; require reports on how levy revenue is spent, simplify the claims process for care workers, and assess the real impact of HGV relief on supply chains.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,017 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0