Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025

**What happened:** On 2 July 2025, the House of Commons voted on the Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025. The regulations passed by 338 ayes to 79 noes. The vote approves secondary legislation (rules made under an existing Act rather than a new bill) that extends government powers to scrutinise and potentially block mergers where a foreign power seeks to acquire a stake in a UK newspaper business. **Why it matters:** The regulations create new mechanisms for ministers to intervene when a foreign state, or an entity connected to one, attempts to take a controlling or significant interest in a British newspaper. This directly affects how UK media ownership is regulated, adding a national security layer to the existing competition and public interest framework under the Enterprise Act 2002. In practical terms, any future transaction involving a foreign power and a UK newspaper title could trigger a government review, with the ability to block the deal if ministers judge it a threat to press independence or national security. The regulations do not affect existing ownership arrangements but apply to future mergers. **The politics:** The vote produced an unusual cross-party pattern. Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, carrying the government to a comfortable majority. However, the Liberal Democrats voted solidly against, as did Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Ulster Unionist Party, and most Greens, suggesting the opposition was not ideologically uniform and may have reflected concerns about government overreach or the scope of the powers rather than straightforward free-market objections. The Conservatives, despite being the largest opposition party, were almost entirely absent, with only two voting no and 114 not participating, making their collective position unclear. Reform UK split three to one in favour. The regulations sit in a broader political context of heightened concern about foreign influence in British institutions, though the cross-cutting nature of the opposition vote signals that unease about the specific design of these powers extended well beyond traditional free-market conservatism.