Division · No. 158Monday, 31 March 2025Commons Taxation

Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2B

301
Ayes
104
Noes
Passed · Government won
240 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 31 March 2025 to reject a House of Lords amendment that would have modified the government's plan to strip private schools of their business rates relief. The motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2B passed by 301 votes to 104. The vote was part of a prolonged back-and-forth between the Commons and the Lords, known as parliamentary ping-pong, over the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill, which forms part of the government's broader push to end tax advantages for independent schools. The vote matters because it clears the way for the government's policy of removing the charitable business rates relief that private schools have historically enjoyed, a policy that runs alongside the separate but related measure to apply VAT to independent school fees. Together, these changes are intended to raise revenue and, in the government's framing, reduce what it describes as taxpayer subsidies to fee-paying schools. The policy affects the roughly 2,500 private schools in England that have benefited from mandatory and discretionary rates relief. The funds raised are intended by the government to be directed toward state education, including the recruitment of additional teachers. The division followed strict party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the three Green MPs and three independents, giving the government a comfortable majority. All 94 voting Conservatives, all four Reform UK MPs, all four Democratic Unionist Party MPs, and both unionist members from Ulster and Traditional Unionist Voice voted against. The vote sat within a series of Commons victories for the government on the same day, with parallel motions to disagree with Lords Amendments 1B, 13B, and a cluster of amendments numbered 15B through 15E all passing by similar margins, reflecting consistent government discipline and a concerted Lords effort to reshape the legislation that the elected chamber repeatedly rejected.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's plan to remove tax exemptions from private schools, rejecting Lords attempts to water down or block these measures
Voting No meant
Oppose removing tax breaks from private schools, siding with the Lords amendments that sought to protect or delay these changes
§ 01Who voted how.405 voting members · 240 absent
Aye303No106DID NOT VOTE · 240

405 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 240 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
262
0
100
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
94
22
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
35
0
7
Independent
3
2
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
4
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.5 principal speakers
Jim McMahonSupportiveOldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Government must reject Lords amendments as they duplicate existing powers and undermine the funding mechanism for permanent RHL relief; the higher multiplier on 1% of properties is necessary and sustainable.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,990 words)
Kevin HollinrakeOpposedThirsk and Malton
Lords amendments should be accepted; the £500,000 threshold is a blunt instrument that punishes aspiration, harms healthcare, retailers and high streets, and creates unfair cliff-edge effects for growing businesses.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (927 words)
Vikki SladeNeutralMid Dorset and North Poole
Support business rates reform but concerned about hospitals and businesses near the threshold being caught; private schools should not be taxed on education.Liberal Democrats · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (575 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Opposes removal of charitable relief from private and faith schools as it unfairly disadvantages parents seeking faith-based education and disproportionately affects faith communities.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,130 words)
Robin SwannQuestioningSouth Antrim
Questions the disjointed approach of funding NHS while simultaneously taxing health services through business rates.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (62 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0